# What exactly are the high energy problems between general relativity and quantum field theory? [duplicate]

I know there are many questions on physics stack exchange devoted to the question of quantum gravity and reconciling GR and QFT, but don't mark this as a duplicate because my question is a bit more specific.

In the PSE page A list of inconveniences between quantum mechanics and (general) relativity? it was explained that the crucial problem in uniting general relativity and quantum mechanics comes when probing high-energy conditions at the Planck scale. However, this answer was not quite detailed enough for me, for I still do not fully understand why the theoretical frameworks clash at these conditions.

Can someone explain thoroughly (preferably conceptually and with minimal math) why general relativity and quantum mechanics implicitly do not work together to describe these high-energy interactions and a few examples of them.

I have a good conceptual understanding of both theories, but have little formal mathematical training.

## marked as duplicate by John Rennie, heather, AccidentalFourierTransform, mpv, ZeroTheHeroAug 10 '17 at 2:05

GR is a theory that predicts e.g. the Big Bang as a singularity; more precisely, a singularity where for the length scale $\Delta x$ holds $\Delta x \mapsto 0$. For classical GR, such a singularity is ok, but in Quantum mechanics you would have a momentum uncertainty
$\Delta p \geq \frac{\hbar}{2 \Delta x} \mapsto \infty$
which means you can't measure any momenta properly and that would be physically impossible. Therefore you must find a theory where the length scale also at the Big Bang has a finite value. Merging GR and QFT is therefore not easy, because in a continuum (which is also used for Special relativistic QFT without gravity) you have $\Delta x \mapsto 0$ for Big Bang and other cosmological singularities.
• 1. The Big Bang is not a prediction of GR, but of specific cosmological models based on observational evidence. Singularity-free universes are perfectly possible within GR, and therefore this does not constitute an incompatibility between GR and QFT. 2. The application of the HUP does not make sense - just because you write a small quantity as $\Delta x$ that doesn't mean it's a standard deviation of a quantum mechanical operator you can plug into the HUP! 3. Your last point - "the infinities" - is what starts to be a correct answer to this question but doesn't go into any useful detail. – ACuriousMind Aug 6 '17 at 18:01