2
$\begingroup$

I am studying Statics and saw that:

The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation:

$M_X = (\vec r \times \vec F) \cdot \vec x \ \ \ $ (or $\ \tau_x = (\vec r \times \vec F) \cdot \vec x \ $)

But in my Physics class I saw:

$\vec M = \vec r \times \vec F \ \ \ $ (or $\ \vec \tau = \vec r \times \vec F \ $)

In the first formula, the torque is a triple product vector, that is, a scalar quantity. But in the second, it is a vector. So, torque (or moment of a force) is a scalar or a vector?

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The torque is a vector. In your $M_X$ you simply have the component of the torque along $\vec x$, and this component is a scalar. $\endgroup$ – ZeroTheHero Aug 2 '17 at 20:16
  • $\begingroup$ Where have you seen the first version written? $\endgroup$ – sammy gerbil Aug 2 '17 at 21:29
  • $\begingroup$ I think that its in Beer's Vectorial Mechanics for Engineers, but i'm not sure. $\endgroup$ – Vinicius ACP Aug 2 '17 at 21:50
  • $\begingroup$ Technically, torque is a pseudo (or axial) vector, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…. $\endgroup$ – jim Jan 24 at 21:48
1
$\begingroup$

It is obviously a vector, as you can see in the 2nd formula.

What you are doing in the first one is getting the $x$-component of that vector. Rememebr that the scalar product is the projection of one vector over the other one's direction. Actually you should write $\hat{x}$ or $\vec{i}$ or $\hat{i}$ to denote that it is a unit vector. That's because a unit vector satisfies

$\vec{v}\cdot\hat{u}=|v| \cdot |1|\cdot \cos(\alpha)=v \cos(\alpha)$

and so it is the projection of the vector itself.

In conclusion, the moment is a vector, and the first formula is only catching one of its components, as noted by the subindex.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Torque (Force Moment) is a vector that describes the location of the Force line of action.

  • Lemma: If you give me a force vector ${\vec F}$ and a moment vector about the origin ${\vec M}$ then I can define a line whose points obey the relationship $\vec{M} = {\vec r} \times {\vec F}$. This line has direction parallel to the force ${\vec F}$ and passes through a point (closest to the origin) defined by $${\vec r} = \frac{ {\vec F} \times {\vec M} }{ \| {\vec F} \|^2 } $$

Proof: Use $\vec{M} = {\vec r} \times {\vec F}$ into the equation for the point.

$$ \require{cancel} \frac{ {\vec F} \times {\vec M} }{ \| {\vec F} \|^2 } = \frac{ {\vec F} \times ({\vec r} \times {\vec F}) }{ \| {\vec F} \|^2 } = \frac{ \vec{r} ( \vec{F} \cdot \vec{F}) - \vec{F} (\cancel{\vec{F} \cdot \vec{r}} ) }{ \| {\vec F} \|^2 } = \vec{r} \frac{\| {\vec F} \|^2}{\| {\vec F} \|^2} = \vec{r} $$

This requires that $\vec{F} \cdot \vec{r}=0$ which is true for the point on the line closest to the origin.

It is true for both statics and dynamics that a moment is just a force at a distance. Only when the net force is zero (force couple) the moment is a pure moment and it does not convey any location information.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ @MichaelLevy - thanks. I changed the wording a bit. I hope you agree it is an improvement. $\endgroup$ – John Alexiou Jan 24 at 20:23
  • $\begingroup$ @MichaelLevy - check the link. It is not working for me. $\endgroup$ – John Alexiou Jan 24 at 23:32
  • $\begingroup$ @MichaelLevy Read also this post and my answer. $\endgroup$ – John Alexiou Jan 24 at 23:36
  • $\begingroup$ The requested URL /metric/metric_public/vectors/vector_coordinate_geometry/vector_equation_of_line.html was not found on this server. $\endgroup$ – John Alexiou Jan 25 at 22:51
  • $\begingroup$ where is your vector equation of a line? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_(geometry)#As_a_vector_equation $\endgroup$ – Michael Levy Jan 25 at 23:00
0
$\begingroup$

There are some application, where we might want to quantify both the torque, which is a vector, and the component of the torque about a particular axis, which is a scalar.

I illustrate an example of this in the figure below, which is from 1 and provided here under fair use for the purpose of scholarship. The door is hinged so that it turns only around the $\mathbf{\widehat{k}}$ axis. Meanwhile, the door knob is located at a position $\mathbf{r}$ relative to the origin. A force $\mathbf{F}$ is applied to the door knob.

By $\boldsymbol{\tau}$, I denote the torque on the door knob, which is $$\boldsymbol{\tau} = \mathbf{r}\times \mathbf{F}.$$ By $\tau_z$, I denote the scalar component of the torque vector about the axis of rotation. So, $$\tau_z = \mathbf{\widehat{k}} \cdot \boldsymbol{\tau} = \left(\mathbf{r}\times \mathbf{F}\right)\cdot \mathbf{\widehat{k}}.$$

enter image description here

Bibliography

1 Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences, 3rd Edition, Mary L. Boas, ISBN: 978-0-471-19826-0 July 2005.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.