-2
$\begingroup$

Of course I know about up and down quarks, but I cannot seem to find that much about the other four (of course being eight if we're including antiquarks). Is mass the only difference between the quarks? Can the other quarks form hadrons of their own? Is there some interesting matter or reaction or anything that any of them can make or do, or are they really as boring as the Internet has been telling me?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

First of all, where did you find those "boring materials on the internet" about the quarks? Quarks are not boring at all; in fact they are of a major importance in the Standard Model.

There are 6 types of quarks (plus their anti-quarks): up,down,charm,strange, top and bottom. Each one has different properties, such as electric charge, mass, color charge and spin.

There are so many materials where you can read about them, that I don't even know which one should I recommend, so I'll just go with a safe bet: wikipedia

And as you mentioned, they can form hadron of their own, and they participate in many processes.

I guess the best way to do it is to read about them, and then decide for yourself if they are boring or not.

Peace !

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you, this was quiet helpful. I had been skimming Wikipedia but had not found that much that interested me - it was mostly just, definitions, names, and numbers. So is the only difference between quarks their mass and charge? The only other thing I found was their life span, but that seems like it would just tie into mass. Thank you again for taking the time. $\endgroup$ – M. Lumsdaine Jul 26 '17 at 21:43
  • $\begingroup$ The only thing is not just the mass. It is the topness and bottomness ..., called flavor, i.e. their specific individual quantum number that is conserved or changes through weak interactions in a specific way, decaying into lower mass and different quark flavor : hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Particles/qrkdec.html $\endgroup$ – anna v Jul 27 '17 at 4:21
  • $\begingroup$ Anna v.... where in my entire answer you saw only the mass? I said "Each one has different properties, such as electric charge, mass, color charge and spin." $\endgroup$ – Robert Poenaru Jul 27 '17 at 9:26
5
$\begingroup$

Wikipedia does a good job of explaining the quarks, but really all you need to know is in the handy Standard Model particle chart:

Quarks come in three generations and two different electrical charges, $+2/3$ and $-1/3$. Like the up and down quarks, which differ in electric charge and therefore in how they can combine to make integer-charge baryons and mesons, the charm/strange and top-bottom quarks work slightly differently with respect to the kinds of combinations they can form. However, that is essentially it, and in particular the up / charm / top and down / strange / bottom triplets behave identically as far as which interactions they're able to take part in.

On the other hand, the masses are different from generation to generation, and that is not just some random property that you jot down and forget: the mass of a particle is (via $E=mc^2$) the energy that it can contribute to a reaction, and the more massive the particle, the more energy it can bring in, and the wider the array of reaction products that can come out.

Thus, if you start with, say, a Lambda baryon, you have enough energy to produce, say, a $\Delta^+$ baryon, which has $uud$ quark content with all their spins aligned (instead of two anti-aligned), and can therefore be seen, roughly, as an excited state of the proton system. On the other hand, if you start with a proton, you would need to provide some significant energy to excite it into the $\Delta^+$ state.

I should also mention that for each of the given quarks there is a quantum number known as flavour, or more specifically strangeness, charm, topness and bottomness, which can be used to characterize the particle content of the reaction at any given state. Unlike electric charge and baryon number, which are always conserved, the individual flavour numbers are only weakly conserved: many processes (and in particular strong-force and electromagnetic interactions) will respect them, but weak-force interactions don't.

Thus, as an example, the strong and electromagnetic interactions forbid the decay of the $\Sigma^+$ baryon (quark content $uus$) into a proton's $uud$, as that would decrease the strangeness of the state, so the process is relatively unlikely, as only weak-force routes can mediate the decay.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Perhaps you could say something about color charge too, and how it changes, unlike electric charge. $\endgroup$ – PM 2Ring Jul 26 '17 at 22:58
  • $\begingroup$ @PM2Ring You're welcome to add an answer with that content yourself. $\endgroup$ – Emilio Pisanty Jul 26 '17 at 23:02
  • $\begingroup$ Thank, that was quite helpful. Another little question I had was this: so you showed the standard model of elementary particles - why are gravitons not on that model with the other gauge bosons? $\endgroup$ – M. Lumsdaine Jul 26 '17 at 23:25
  • $\begingroup$ @M.Lumsdaine Because the gravitons are not part of the standard model of particle physics. $\endgroup$ – Emilio Pisanty Jul 26 '17 at 23:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.