In the context of Weyl semimetals, I often read the statement that a Lifshitz phase transition occurs when a Weyl cone is tilted so much that it tips over and crosses through the original Fermi level.

Hence my question: how is a Lifshitz phase transition defined? Is it just the statement that a Fermi surface goes from closed to open? Is there more to it? A reference to a minimal model of such a transition would be appreciated.


2 Answers 2


A Lifshitz transition is a change in the topology of a Fermi surface. They involve the appearance of zeros in the energy spectrum of a many-body fermion system, excluding the normal Fermi surface of course.

Click here for Lifshitz's original work. Also, this is another good reference for Lifshitz transitions (from Volovik).


A Lifshitz transition occurs when the gradient term in the Ginzburg-Landau (GL) free energy functional changes sign, meaning one must then include a higher-order gradient term to stabilize the free energy. Near the phase transition, one expands the free energy in powers of an order parameter. Consider the simplest case of a scalar order parameter $\phi$, such that the free energy takes the form

$$F \sim \int d^dx \left(\alpha\,(\partial_\mu\phi)^2 + \beta \,\phi^2 + \gamma \,\phi^4\right)$$

For simplicity, we assume that $\alpha > 0$, $\beta$ is a function of temperature, and $\gamma > 0$ is a constant. If $\beta$ is positive, then the free energy is minimized by $\phi = 0$ everywhere. Since $\alpha > 0$, the free energy is minimized by a homogeneous $\phi$. If at some temperature $T_c$ $\beta$ becomes negative, there will be a second-order phase transition, and the free energy will be minimized by a non-zero $\phi$. A Lifshitz transition occurs if $\alpha$ becomes negative, in which case we must include a $(\partial_\mu\phi)^4$ or $(\nabla^2 \phi)^2$ term to stabilize the system. The new minimum of the free energy is now obtained by a non-uniform $\phi$, such as spiral order in a magnet, or charge density waves in a metal. In reciprocal space, this would correspond to a minimum with a non-zero wavevector $\mathbf{q}$. Usually, the ordering wavevector is incommensurate with the underlying lattice. See, for example, chapter 2 section 4 of Daniel Khomskii's book Basic Aspects of the Quantum Theory of Solids.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.