The de Sitter spacetime can be derived from the vacuum Friedmann equations given a choice of $k=0$, where $k$ defines the spatial curvature of the spacetime. The resulting metric in $(t,x,y,z)$ is given by $$ds^{2}=-dt^{2}+e^{2\sqrt{\frac{\Lambda}{3}}t}[dx^{2}+dy^{2}+dz^{2}].$$ The hypersurfaces of constant time therefore correspond to flat space (Minkowski in three dimensions scaled by an exponential term), which is consistent with the value of $k=0$ used in the metric derivation.
I have been motivated to switch to global coordinates $(t,\chi,\theta,\phi)$ since the above metric does not cover the entire manifold. The global de Sitter metric is given by $$ds^{2}=-dt^{2}+\frac{3}{\Lambda}\cosh^{2}\left(\sqrt{\frac{\Lambda}{3}}t\right)[d\chi^{2}+\sin^{2}\chi d\theta^{2}+\sin^{2}\chi\sin^{2}\theta d\phi^{2}]$$
and hypersurfaces of constant time now correspond to 3-spheres with some constant scaling.
Has the value of $k$ changed in switching coordinate systems as the constant time hypersurfaces have shifted from flat to spherical? I am inclined to say no, however I am struggling to justify this apparent inconsistency. Is this simply a result of considering the spacetime globally?