0
$\begingroup$

I found in many places that the average momentum of a particle is given by:

$$\langle p\rangle =\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\psi^* \left ( \frac{\hbar}{i} \right ) \frac{ \partial \psi}{\partial x} \: \mathrm{d}x $$

I think that it comes from considering the classical momentum:

$$\langle p\rangle=m\frac{\mathrm{d}\langle x\rangle}{\mathrm{d}t}$$

and that the expected value of the position is given by:

$$\langle x\rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}x\: \left | \psi(x,t) \right |^2 \: \mathrm{d}x $$

But when replacing $\langle x\rangle$ and differentiating inside the integral I don't know how to handle the derivatives of $\psi$ for getting the average momentum formula. Any suggestion?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Your first equation is just $\langle\psi|\hat{p}|\psi\rangle$ where $\hat{p}$ is the momentum operator $\hat{p}=-i\hbar\frac{d}{dx}$. $\endgroup$ Jul 14, 2017 at 4:15
  • $\begingroup$ What is ⟨ψ|p^|ψ⟩, I don't get the notation. Sorry. $\endgroup$ Jul 14, 2017 at 4:20

2 Answers 2

3
$\begingroup$

Since your question is about the single-particle momentum operator, I will assume that we are dealing with a single particle moving in an arbitrary scalar potential. Suppose we start with

$$\langle p \rangle = m\frac{d\langle x\rangle}{dt}$$

and

$$\langle x\rangle = \int x|\psi|^2 dx = \int \psi^* x \psi\; dx.$$

Applying the time derivative to the above yields

$$\frac{d\langle x\rangle}{dt}=\int\frac{\partial\psi^*}{\partial t}x\psi+\psi^*\frac{\partial x}{\partial t}\psi+\psi^*x\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t}\;dx$$

Since the operator $x$ has no explicit time dependence, the middle term is zero. In addition, the Schrodinger equation states

$$\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t} = \frac{1}{i\hbar}H\psi.$$

Applying this to $\psi^*$, we have

$$\frac{\partial\psi^*}{\partial t} = \frac{-1}{i\hbar}\psi^*H$$

and substituting both of these in for the appropriate quantities in $\frac{d\langle x\rangle}{dt}$:

$$\frac{d\langle x\rangle}{dt} = \int\frac{-1}{i\hbar}\psi^*Hx\psi+\frac{1}{i\hbar}\psi^*xH\psi\; dx=\frac{1}{i\hbar}\int\psi^*[x,H]\psi\; dx.$$

Now all that is left is to calculate the commutator $[x,H]$. Since we're dealing with a single particle in an arbitrary scalar potential, we can write $H=\frac{p^2}{2m}+V(x,t)$ so that:

$$[x,H]=\left[x,\frac{p^2}{2m}+V(x,t)\right]=\left[x,\frac{p^2}{2m}\right]+[x,V(x,t)].$$

Since $V(x,t)$ is a function of $x$ alone*, we have that $[x,V(x,t)]=0$. We then use the commutator identity

$$[A,BC]=[A,B]C+B[A,C]$$

to write

$$\left[x,\frac{p^2}{2m}\right] = \frac{1}{2m}([x,p]p+p[x,p])=\frac{1}{2m}(i\hbar p+pi\hbar)=\frac{i\hbar}{m}p$$

since $[x,p]=i\hbar$. The representation of $p$ in the position basis is $-i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial x}$, so in the position basis

$$[x,H]=\frac{\hbar^2}{m}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}.$$

Finally, substituting, we have that

$$\frac{d\langle x\rangle}{dt} = \frac{1}{i\hbar}\int\psi^*[x,H]\psi\; dx = \int \psi^*\left(\frac{\hbar}{im}\right)\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x}\; dx$$

so that

$$\langle p\rangle = m\frac{d\langle x\rangle}{dt} = \int \psi^*\left(\frac{\hbar}{i}\right)\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x}\; dx.$$

*What I mean here is that $V$ is not a function of any other operators, and $t$ isn't an operator in quantum mechanics, only a parameter.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ I want to know how to get the average momentum formula from the momentum definition. $\endgroup$ Jul 14, 2017 at 4:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JoshuaSalazar From the definition of the momentum operator in position space? Or from the classical definition? What exactly do you want to start with? $\endgroup$ Jul 14, 2017 at 4:36
  • $\begingroup$ The classical definition $\endgroup$ Jul 14, 2017 at 4:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JoshuaSalazar Edited. $\endgroup$ Jul 14, 2017 at 5:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JoshuaSalazar That's what happens when you take the complex conjugate of a product of operators. It's an identity that arises from group theory. The Hamiltonian is Hermitian, so its complex conjugate is itself. $\endgroup$ Jul 14, 2017 at 6:11
2
$\begingroup$

$m \frac{d}{dt} \langle x \rangle = m \frac{d}{dt} \int dx \ \Psi^* x \Psi$

Use product rule to get the above into the form:

$= m \int dx \left[\frac{\partial \Psi^*}{\partial t} x\Psi + \Psi^* \frac{\partial x}{\partial t} \Psi + \Psi^* x \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial t} \right] \ \ \ \ \ -(1)$

The second term contains $\frac{\partial x}{\partial t}$, which is $0$.

This is just calculus. Now comes the crucial step of imposing physics: the Schrodinger equation: $ i \hbar \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial t} = \hat{H} \Psi$ (and also $ -i \hbar \frac{\partial \Psi^*}{\partial t} = \hat{H} \Psi^*$)

Write the operator $\hat{H}$ in terms of second order spatial derivative (acting on $\Psi$ and $\Psi^*$). Through Schrodinger's equation, you get a relation between second order spatial derivative and first order time derivative. Replace the first order time derivatives in $(1)$ with second order spatial derivatives. And then integrate by parts, to reduce the second order spatial derivative to first order spatial derivative, using the boundary condition that $\frac{d\Psi}{dx}\left(\text{and} \frac{d\Psi^*}{dx}\right)$ go to zero at infinity. After a few steps of algebra, and you get it to the form $\int dx \ \Psi^* \left( -i\hbar \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} \right)$, which is what you wanted: $\langle \hat{p} \rangle$.

This (or a similar) calculation is usually given in various resources. Can you take it from here and do it yourself?

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Now I get it more clearly. But, I suppose that the $V(x,t)$ terms would vanish at some point right? Or should I consider the potential to be zero? $\endgroup$ Jul 14, 2017 at 5:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, they will cancel out. You don't have to assume $V=0$ $\endgroup$
    – Avantgarde
    Jul 14, 2017 at 6:13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Avantgarde : only if the potential is real will the relevant terms cancel. (Complex $Vs$ occur in simple models of unstable particles, and possibly elsewhere. The imaginary part of a complex $V$ functions like a damping term.) $\endgroup$ Jul 14, 2017 at 11:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ZeroTheHero Yeah, I did not add that caveat. Thanks $\endgroup$
    – Avantgarde
    Jul 14, 2017 at 12:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.