I'm trying to learn relativity theory on my own (special to begin with) and there's one basic misconception in my efforts.
Consider the usual setup for twins paradox, but let for now forget the accelaration part. I only want to separate the directions of movement. When the twins are moving apart from each other we know that the time for the travelling twin flows more slowly than for the stationary one. Then again it flows more slowly for stationary one also, when as far as the travelling one view is concerned. Yet they're both right. My interpretation folows that the information of time on Earth is transferred by light, so delay stacks with growing distance and it occurs evenly for both observers. Up to here everything fits to the theory.
When the direction of movement is however changed to the opposite, the light gets to both observers faster. Then both of them should see events happening faster. That implies the whole delay would cancel out. That's obviously not coherent with relativity theory at all.
I would like to aks why is this interpretation wrong and what is the right one then. I'm aware I think of it in a wrong way, but each time I try to explain it to myself I loop back to the same setup. I just keep getting back to this exact point whenever I'm like 'ok, I think I got it'. Should I just read further to general ralativity in pursuit of the answer? Or it's elementary misunderstanding, which is going to block any following concepts anyway?
I came across this post: What is time dilation really? It's well explained here, but the thing strictly connected to my question is omitted. That is the minus sign in Minkowski metric. What I've done above is just that this sign depends on velocity sign.
Put in ither words I meant Twin A stays on Earth and twin B travells away and comes back. Imagine being B on you're only interested in the rate of things happening on Earth. I agree that the rate will be perceived slower when travelling away, but it should be perceived faster when heading towards. It's fully analoguous to sound and Doppler's effect, when approaching I can hear higher frequency than when going away from the source. Quesion can be hence restated: why the analogy with sound doesn't apply?