3
$\begingroup$

A little background: I've chopped up a small LCoS "Pico Projector" and turned it into a micro-projector. E.g. I removed all the projection lenses and replaced them with basically a microscope objective stack: LCoS micro-projector

My tests work alright with incoherent white light (from a flashlight). Here is an example of the working white light with a test image: Incoherent white light

But it fails miserably with 405nm laser light. Here is the same test image, annotated to help see the "100" from the test:

405nm laser light test

Now, it's my understanding that LCoS projectors operate on the principle of S and P polarized light. E.g. incoherent light enters the optical assembly and is split into S/P by a polarized beam splitter. The P light goes straight through and is dumped, while the S light is reflected towards the LCoS.

If the pixel it hits is "on", the polarization is converted to P, bounces off the reflective portion of the LCoS and then exits the projector. If the pixel is "off", the light simply reflects without a change in polarization state, reflects again off the beam splitter and is sent back towards the light source.

LCoS diagram

So given all of that, what's going on with the 405nm laser light test? The test pattern is visible (barely), but there is a huge amount of "noise". My current theories are:

  • The polarized beam splitter is not rated for near-UV light. While technically still in the visible range (400+), it's pretty deep-visible. Perhaps the polarizer just doesn't work with these wavelengths? If you look closely at the "mirrored" section of the splitter, you can see a wavy texture that is similar to the noise in that above image

  • Something is amiss with polarization states. I did try to rotate the laser to see if that would help (e.g. maybe it was emitting S when I needed P, so rotating 90° would fix that) but to no avail. So perhaps my laser is emitting circularly polarized light?

  • Interference patterns of some sort. Maybe the light is interfering with itself somewhere in the light path (similar to an interferometer) and causing those standing wave patterns?

Do any of these sound plausible? I admit we are reaching the edge of my optics knowledge :)

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

My guess is that there are multiple things at the same time, which include the ones you mention. But probably the most fundamental one (I dealt with it once) is that your reflective pixels are in matrix which acts as a diffraction grating. Even if the size of the single pixel is larger than the wavelength (several tens of microns Vs 400 nm), the pixels and the opaque space between them have sharp edges, regularly distributed. So with monochromatic light you'll get the diffraction from that. One way out of it is to spatially filter the light, with some redesign: a pinhole between two positive lenses, before the objective.

Then you may have all kind of interferences and speckles, due to reflections and impurities in the surfaces. For the latter, clean all the optics. For the former, use anti-reflection coated optics if possible. You may want to try with a LED instead of a laser, the lower coherence could help, at the cost of a beam more difficult to couple to the optical path.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Ohh, interesting! I would never have thought of that. I just pulled apart all the components to test them individually, and I think you're probably right. The lenses all appear to be fine (no major speckle/diffraction), the problem only shows up with the splitter + LCoS. If I replace the LCoS with a mirror, the pattern vanishes and nothing is transmitted through the splitter, making me think it's A) diffraction as you mentioned and B) the splitter works just fine with 405nm (otherwise it wouldn't be blocking). Thanks so much! I'll try the pinhole, and/or LEDs $\endgroup$ – Zach Jul 3 '17 at 14:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.