2
$\begingroup$

I learned recently that if you have the Dirac spinor represented in the Weyl (chiral) basis $\Psi = \begin{pmatrix} \psi_L \\ \psi_R \end{pmatrix}$, then given a Lorentz Transformation $\Lambda = exp[\frac{1}{2}\Omega_{\rho \sigma}M^{\rho\sigma}]$, the corresponding transformation $S[\Lambda]$ for $\Psi \rightarrow S[\Lambda]\Psi$ looks like $S[\Lambda] = exp[\frac{1}{2}\Omega_{\rho \sigma}S^{\rho\sigma}]$. In the chiral basis, this looks like each of the $\psi_L$ and $\psi_R$ transforming as the different spin-1/2 representations of $so(3,1)$.

Here, the $so(3,1)$ Lie algebra is represented by the standard Lorentz matrices $M^{\rho\sigma}$ for the $x^\mu$ transformation, and the other matrices $S^{\rho\sigma}$ are the algebra generated by the gamma matrices $S^{\rho\sigma} = \frac{1}{4}[\gamma^\rho,\gamma^\sigma]$.

My question is (in probably imprecise phrasing), is it possible to choose $\gamma^\mu$ to be 8x8 matrices in such a way that $S^{\rho\sigma} = \frac{1}{4}[\gamma^\rho,\gamma^\sigma] = M^{\rho\sigma} \oplus M^{\rho\sigma} $? i.e. can we pick $\gamma^\mu$ so that the chiral components $\psi_L, \psi_R$ each transform like 4-vectors would?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$
  1. OP apparently wants to discuss reducible representations of the Clifford algebra $Cl(1,3;\mathbb{R})$.

  2. Concretely, it seems that OP is asking about an 8-dimensional direct sum representation $$W~:=~V\oplus V$$ of 2 copies of the 4-dimensional Dirac spinor representation $$V~:=~(\frac{1}{2},0) \oplus (0,\frac{1}{2}).$$ See also this Phys.SE post.

  3. The $8\times 8$ gamma matrices $$\Gamma^{\mu} ~=~\begin{pmatrix} \gamma^{\mu} & 0 \cr 0 & \gamma^{\mu} \end{pmatrix}$$ in the $W$-representation are block matrices with 2 copies of $4\times 4$ gamma matrices in the $V$-representation.

  4. The $W$-representation of the Lorentz generators take a similar block diagonal form, cf. OP's last question (v1).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ But... this trivial Gamma rep will never connect the L and R components, no? $\endgroup$ – Cosmas Zachos Jun 30 '17 at 16:15
  • $\begingroup$ I was more so asking if there existed a $(1,0) \oplus (0,1)$ representation of the gamma matrices. This post seems to say that the irreducible complex representations look like V. $\endgroup$ – Joe Jul 1 '17 at 19:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Joe I see... as long as you appreciate this rep, e.g., the 0 component in the mass term, never mixes the upper 4 with the lower four components ... what I understood to be the defining feature of L and R.... Look at $\Gamma_5$; its chiral projectors eliminate two doublets in tandem. $\endgroup$ – Cosmas Zachos Jul 1 '17 at 19:41
0
$\begingroup$

Without full appreciation of the gist of your question (8×8?), let me just review the chiral basis expressions for $\gamma_5$ and the Lorentz generators $S^{\mu\nu}$, which are both block diagonal with respect to the chiral projections, so they do not mix $\psi_L$ with $\psi_R$, unlike the γs:

$$\gamma^0 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & I_2 \\ I_2 & 0 \end{pmatrix},\quad \gamma^k = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & \sigma^k \\ -\sigma^k & 0 \end{pmatrix},\quad \gamma^5 = \begin{pmatrix} -I_2 & 0 \\ 0 & I_2 \end{pmatrix},$$

$$ S^{0j} = \tfrac{1}{2}\begin{pmatrix} -\sigma^j & 0 \\ 0 & \sigma^j \end{pmatrix}, \qquad S^{jk}=\frac{i\epsilon^{kjm}}{2} \begin{pmatrix} \sigma^m & 0 \\ 0 & \sigma^m \end{pmatrix} = i \epsilon^{kjm} \gamma_5 S^{0m} . $$

So, generators (in the algebra), manifestly constitute a reduced representation of non-interacting 2×2 blocks.

More formally, the reduced 22 rep is $$ 2S^{0j}=(-\sigma^j)\oplus \sigma^j, \qquad 2S^{jk}=i\epsilon^{kjm} (\sigma^m\oplus \sigma^m). $$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I understand this part. In the Weyl representation of $\gamma^\mu$ that you gave, the generated $S^{\mu\nu}$ are block diagonal, and each block corresponds to the $SL(2,C)$ Lie Algebra. My question was asking whether we can pick the gamma matrices to be 8x8 real matrices so that $S^{\mu\nu}$ are block diagonal and correspond to the $SO(3,1)$ Lie Algebra. If this were true, we could treat each component, $\psi_L, \psi_R$ as transforming like a 4-vector, by the expression for $S[\Lambda]$ given above. $\endgroup$ – Joe Jun 27 '17 at 19:53
  • $\begingroup$ ?? What's wrong with this representation? Of course the algebra of the 6 Ss is the algebra of SO(3,1); how could it fail that? It is a bi-spinor rep, acting on 4D: $\psi_L\oplus \psi_R$ rep. You want to add the two spin 1/2s of each block into a spin 1 of each? $\endgroup$ – Cosmas Zachos Jun 27 '17 at 21:11
  • $\begingroup$ There's nothing wrong with the representation per-say. I meant that I wanted the 6 Ss as the same matrices as the Lorentz Algebra as regularly viewed in 4d space, or as a direct sum of them. I want to know if we can express the spinor as two spin 1's instead of two spin 1/2's by some other choice of gamma matrices that aren't in $C^{4x4}$, but in $R^{8x8}$. I haven't seen anywhere that it can't be done explicitly, but I haven't seen its impossibility stated, and I'm having trouble constructing them myself, which is why I'm asking on stackexchnge $\endgroup$ – Joe Jun 27 '17 at 21:28
  • $\begingroup$ I see. Your want the spinor map extended to the Lorentz group. It maps 2x2 complex matrices to real vectors. It is the basis of twistor theory, but a very different question. $\endgroup$ – Cosmas Zachos Jun 27 '17 at 21:56
  • $\begingroup$ You seem to be trying to reinvent APS, a sorry tale.... $\endgroup$ – Cosmas Zachos Jun 27 '17 at 22:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.