2
$\begingroup$

In the wikipedia page

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi%E2%80%93Dirac_statistics#Canonical_ensemble

the Fermi-Dirac distribution is obtained from the canonical ensemble in the following manner:

The average occupation number is given by

\begin{equation} \bar{n}_{i}=\frac{\displaystyle \sum_{n_1,n_2,...}n_{i}\,e^{-\beta(n_1E_1+n_2E_2+...)}}{\displaystyle \sum_{n_1,n_2,...}e^{-\beta(n_1E_1+n_2E_2+...)}} \end{equation}

where the summation is over the sets of $n_r$ that satisfy $\sum\,n_r=N$, being $N$ the total number of particles in the system. The derivation followed in Wikipedia then separates the state of energy $E_i$ and calls

\begin{equation} \bar{n}_{i}=\frac{\displaystyle \sum_{n_i} n_{i}\,e^{-\beta\, n_iE_i} \, Z_i(N-n_i)}{\displaystyle \sum_{n_i}\,e^{-\beta\, n_iE_i} \, Z_i(N-n_i)} \end{equation}

where $Z_{i}(N-n_i) = \sum_{n_1,n_n,...} \,e^{-\beta\,(n_1E_1+n_2E_2+...)}$. The summation here does not consider the state $n_i$. Since for the Fermi-Dirac case $n_i=0,1$, it is possible to write the summation easily (it has only two terms) to obtain

\begin{equation} \bar{n}_{i}=\frac{\displaystyle 1}{\displaystyle \bigg[Z_i(N)/Z_i(N-1)\bigg]\,e^{-\beta\,E_i} +1} \end{equation}

which will, in turn, result in the Dirac-Fermi distribution once the ratio between the partition functions is related to the chemical potential.

Now, I'm trying to follow the same procedure to obtain the Bose-Einstein distribution but in this case $n_i$ can vary between $0$ and $\infty$ and the summation cannot be done in any direct way I could think of. How can I approach this?

Thank you very much.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

The expression: $$\begin{equation} \bar{n}_{i}=\frac{\displaystyle \sum_{n_i} n_{i}\,e^{-\beta\, n_iE_i} \, Z_i(N-n_i)}{\displaystyle \sum_{n_i}\,e^{-\beta\, n_iE_i} \, Z_i(N-n_i)} \end{equation}$$ can be rewrite in a usual for statphysics manner: $$\bar{n}_{i}=-\frac{1}{\beta}\frac{\partial\ Ln {\ Z(N)}}{\partial E_i}$$ We denoted denominator as $Z(N)$ -canonical partition function of the system (do not confuse it with $Z_i(N)$ - partition function with "punctured" i-th one particle state. Then, denoting $z_i=e^{ \beta \mu}$ -"punctured" fugacity, we can write: $$Z(N)=\sum_{n_i=0}^ {n_i=N}\ e^{-\beta\, n_iE_i} \, Z_i(N-n_i) = \sum_{n_i=0}^ {n_i=N}\ (e^{-\beta\,E_i})^{n_i} (\frac{1}{z_i})^{N-n_i} =$$ $$=z_i^{-N}\sum_{n_i=0}^ {n_i=N}\ (z_ie^{-\beta\,E_i})^{n_i} $$ Then, sequentially we write down the sum formulae for a finite geometric series, take the logarithm, tend $N$ to infinity, and differentiate by $E_i$. Finally, acting in the wiki spirit, we replace $\mu_i$ =$\mu$

PS. After I wrote this answer, I looked at the link in Wikipedia, it turns out the derivation of the B-E distribution by a similar method is in the same link ((Reif 1965) on p. 342

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

The proof is here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bose%E2%80%93Einstein_statistics#Derivation_in_the_canonical_approach.

They also have a proof in the setting of the grand canonical ensemble which I think is a much simpler derivation.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It is the canonical ensemble but it is a different approach. I was wondering how to generalise the procedure carried out for the Fermi-Dirac case. $\endgroup$ – Gabu Jun 22 '17 at 23:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.