If I have a 2+1 dimensional operator of the form $$ \mathcal{O}^{\mu\nu} = \alpha g^{\mu\nu} + \beta k^\mu k^\nu + \gamma \epsilon^{\mu\nu\kappa} k_\kappa $$ and want to find it's inverse $$ (\mathcal{O}^{-1})_{\nu\rho} = A g_{\nu\rho} + B k_\nu k_\rho + C \epsilon_{\nu\rho\lambda} k^\lambda $$ I could multiply them with each other and use the constraint that (here I used a Minkowski metric with $(+,-,-)$ signature, resulting in the property that $\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho} = \epsilon^{\;\;\nu\rho}_\mu = \epsilon_{\mu\nu\rho}$ ) $$\begin{align} \mathcal{O}^{\mu\nu}(\mathcal{O}^{-1})_{\nu\rho} &= \left( \alpha A - \gamma C k^2 \right)\delta^\mu_\rho \\ & + \left( \gamma C + A \beta + \alpha B + \beta B k^2 \right)k^\mu k_\rho\\ & + \left( \gamma A + \alpha C \right)\epsilon_{\nu\rho\lambda}k^\lambda g^{\mu\nu} = \delta^\mu_\rho \end{align}$$ However, this gives me the constraints $$\begin{align*} &\alpha A - \gamma C k^2 = 1 & A &= \frac 1\alpha (1-\gamma C k^2)\\ &\gamma A + \alpha C = 0 & A &= - \frac{\alpha C}{\gamma}\\ &\gamma C + A \beta + \alpha B + \beta B k^2 = 0 & B &= \frac{-(\gamma C + A\beta)}{\alpha + \beta k^2} \\ \end{align*}$$ that do not seem to be self-consistent. For example, calculating $C$ from the first two constraints, and then calculating the corresponding values for $A$ gives different values for $A$. In addition, when I multiply the resulting inverse operator $$\begin{equation} (\mathcal{O}^{-1})_{\nu\rho} = \frac{1}{\alpha^2 - \gamma^2 k^2} \left[ -\gamma g_{\nu\rho} + \frac{\gamma(\beta - \alpha)}{\alpha + \beta k^2} k_\nu k_\rho + \alpha \epsilon_{\nu\rho\lambda} k^\lambda \right] \end{equation}$$ with the original, I do not find $$ \mathcal{O}^{\mu\nu}(\mathcal{O}^{-1})_{\nu\rho} = \delta^\mu_\rho $$


1 Answer 1


Maybe I have done some error but I have this expressions for the coefficients:

$ \left\{\left\{A\to \frac{\alpha }{\alpha ^2+\gamma ^2 k^2},B\to \frac{\gamma ^2-\alpha \beta }{\left(\alpha +\beta k^2\right) \left(\alpha ^2+\gamma ^2 k^2\right)},C\to -\frac{\gamma }{\alpha ^2+\gamma ^2 k^2}\right\}\right\} $

Are they the same of yours?

  • $\begingroup$ But then, you have imposed to get a delta, so maybe you are doing some mistake when you verify that they are the right solutions $\endgroup$ Jun 9, 2017 at 11:17
  • $\begingroup$ Did you use my result for the constraints or did you invert the operator yourself? I do find $A = \frac{-\gamma}{\alpha^2 - \gamma^2 k^2}$, $B = \frac{1}{\alpha^2 - \gamma^2 k^2} \frac{\gamma(\beta - \alpha)}{\alpha + \beta k^2}$, $C = \frac{\alpha}{\alpha^2 - \gamma^2 k^2}$ from my constraint equations. $\endgroup$
    – Jeroen
    Jun 9, 2017 at 11:18
  • $\begingroup$ I used your constraints and solved the system using Mathematica $\endgroup$ Jun 9, 2017 at 11:19
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, you are completely right, I did some very stupid things while solving them by hand and decided it was time to get some coffee. Using the right values for $A$, $B$ and $C$ everything works out fine. Thanks for pointing out my mistakes. $\endgroup$
    – Jeroen
    Jun 9, 2017 at 12:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.