I'm considering D=1+1 kink solution here.

Given a D=2 theory with $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry, there are 4 different mappings (or 2 distinct sectors---trivial and kink) from spacetime manifold (or just a spacelike hypersurface as a section of it) to vacuum manifold: $$ \phi_{\text{Domain wall}}(x=\pm \infty)=\pm v\quad \text{and} \quad\phi_{\text{Domain wall}}(x=\pm \infty)=\mp v. $$ Normally, we say that transition between configurations is not allowed because it takes infinite amount of energy. I know that degenerate vacuum allows topologically stable field configuration and explicitly broken symmetry would lead to unstable configuration.

Question 1: Is the "transition'' we talk about here is spatial version of the similar "tunneling'' of spacetime in instanton physics (semi-classical solutions in quantum cosmology)? After all, instantons are interpreted as "localized in time'' (thus like a particle in some sense) and solitons are localized in space.

If so, basically, transition between different field configurations is tunneling process.

Question 2: How do I verify the claim "one needs infinite amount of energy to transient from one configuration to another"? I can imagine the tunneling exponent is proportional to the action. Infinite amount of energy means infinite action. Doesn't this mean that the tunneling possibility is zero?

  • $\begingroup$ "one needs infinite amount of energy to transient from one configuration to another"-Is this the correct reason why we don't see tunnelling. I thought the tunnelling amplitude is exponentially suppressed in the thermodynamic limit. Do you have the reference where you encountered this phrase? Thanks @Budding $\endgroup$ – SRS Aug 7 '17 at 15:17

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.