3
$\begingroup$

I cannot find anywhere on the web or on some books the esplicit expression for the time evolution of squeezed states (defined as $|\xi\rangle = S(\xi)|0\rangle = e^{\frac{1}{2}(\xi^*a^2-\xi (a^\dagger)^2)}|0\rangle$, where $|0\rangle$ is the harmonic oscillator ground state). I know they should be gaussian wave packet whose shape should evolve over time, but what's the esplicit expression for $|\xi(t)\rangle$? and for squeezed coherent states $|\xi,\alpha\rangle = D(\alpha)S(\xi)|0\rangle$? Moreover what is also the time-dependent expression for $\Delta x$ and $\Delta p$? They should oscillate over time, so that their product remains always equal to $\frac{\hbar}{2}$, but how?

Thank you in advance!

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Take a look at this paper and the references it cites. $\endgroup$ – Selene Routley Jun 2 '17 at 8:25
2
$\begingroup$

It is a very good question with a subtle answer! Let me give you a short answer and then recommend a good paper that you can take a look.

The time evolution of a squeezed states defined as you mentioned is related to the way that the squeezing is produced. The squeezed states are produced in nonlinear processes in which a "classical" electromagnetic field drives a nonlinear medium. In the interaction picture the corresponding Hamiltonian for one such nonlinear optical process, that of parametric down-conversion can be written as

\begin{equation} \hat{H}_I = [\epsilon (a^{\dagger})^2+\epsilon^* (a)^2] \end{equation}

The quantity $\epsilon$ includes the amplitude of the driving field as well as the second-order susceptibility for the down-conversion. The operator $\hat{U}(t) = \exp(-i\hat{H}t/\hbar$) describing the time evolution of the single-mode under consideration can be written as

\begin{equation} \hat{S}(\xi) = \exp\left[\xi \frac{(\hat{a}^{\dagger 2})}{2}-\xi^* \frac{(\hat{a}^{2})}{2} \right] \end{equation} where $\xi = -i\epsilon t$. It is this quantaty $\xi$ (also given by $\xi = r \exp(i\theta)$) which will determine the size of the squeezing and will depend on the interaction time (essentially the lenght of the nonlinear medium). This idea can also be generalized to the case of a squeezed coherent states. Finally, the time dependence of the canonical operators $\hat{x}$ and $\hat{p}$ will not be explicity as in the past case. If you take a look on the quadrature operators you will came to the conclusion that if the evolution continues for time t, we will have

\begin{align} \hat{X}_1(t) &= \hat{S}^\dagger(\xi) \, \hat{X}_1(0) \, \hat{S}(\xi) = \hat{X}_1(0) e^{-r} \\ \hat{X}_2(t) &= \hat{S}^\dagger(\xi) \, \hat{X}_2(0) \, \hat{S}(\xi) = \hat{X}_2(0) e^{r} \end{align}

For a good discussion and detailed discussion about these issues, please check the following paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1401.4118.pdf;

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.