0
$\begingroup$

Wikipedia about the prediction of the Aharonov–Bohm effect:

Werner Ehrenberg (1901–1975) and Raymond E. Siday first predicted the effect in 1949.

What was the theoretical basis for this prediction?

And BTW, an older question about Has The Aharonov-Bohm Effect Been Experimentally Proven? is not answered clearly. It seems that the claimed Aharonov–Bohm effect in 1959 was a prediction too. So which different theoretical basis was used by Aharonov and Bohm?

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

It's well described in the wikipedia page, but it just falls out from the Hamiltonian for a particle in a region with non-zero $\vec{A}$ but not necessarily non-zero $\vec{B}$ or $\vec{E}$:

Using cylindrical coordinates for a particle confined to a ring of radius $R$ with a solenoid of radius $r < R$ inside,

$H = \frac{1}{2m} \left( -\hbar^2\nabla^2 + \frac{2i\hbar q}{c}\vec{A}\cdot \vec{\nabla} + \frac{q^2}{c^2}|\vec{A}|^2 \right)$

This can be expressed

$H = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2mR^2} \left( \frac{\partial}{\partial \theta} - K \right)^2; K = i\frac{q \Phi}{2c\hbar}$

Where $\Phi$ is the flux. When you work out solutions with boundary conditions $\psi(\theta) = \psi(\theta + 2\pi)$, you will see the energy only cares about the flux, but the wavefunction itself still depends on $\vec{A}$, lending itself to potential interference effects, hence the Abraham Bohm effect.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Señor, please explain it more in detail. Thank you in advance. $\endgroup$ – HolgerFiedler May 29 '17 at 4:18
  • $\begingroup$ @HolgerFiedler what detail would you like? $\endgroup$ – Señor O May 29 '17 at 4:43
  • $\begingroup$ Why for a shielded field there is predicted a force? Connect your answer with this. $\endgroup$ – HolgerFiedler May 29 '17 at 5:26
  • $\begingroup$ @HolgerFiedler "The Aharonov–Bohm effect, sometimes called the Ehrenberg–Siday–Aharonov–Bohm effect, is a quantum mechanical phenomenon in which an electrically charged particle is affected by an electromagnetic potential (V, A), despite being confined to a region in which both the magnetic field B and electric field E are zero" $\endgroup$ – Señor O May 29 '17 at 6:31
  • $\begingroup$ this says nothing about a force $\endgroup$ – Señor O May 29 '17 at 6:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.