If one sings the letter "A" and "M" at the same volume and pitch, the two letters are still differentiable. If both pitch and volume are the same however, shouldn't the sound be the exact same?

  • 6
    $\begingroup$ You can't sing the letter B, because it's a stop consonant. If you mean saying "bee", as in holding the vowel e, it's in the relative strength of the overtones. $\endgroup$
    – knzhou
    Commented May 27, 2017 at 17:53
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Maybe this wikipedia page helps (it deals with the case of vowels, eg 'A' versus 'O'). $\endgroup$
    – Luzanne
    Commented May 27, 2017 at 18:22
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ The word you're looking for is timbre. $\endgroup$ Commented May 27, 2017 at 21:45
  • 9
    $\begingroup$ Letters do not sound like anything because they are merely written symbols. You are talking about speech sounds (phones). This is not nitpicking. How a letter is read out depends on the language, the speech/dialect of the reader, the context of the letter, etc. $\endgroup$
    – Szabolcs
    Commented May 28, 2017 at 19:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Szabolcs presumably means phonemes instead of phones, but it's a very important distinction, too. $\endgroup$ Commented May 28, 2017 at 21:05

4 Answers 4


You don't sing a single pitch - you sing a frequency and its harmonics. Using a simple spectrum analyzer, this is me "singing" the letter A and M, alternately (AMAMA, actually):

enter image description here

The letter "A" is the one with more harmonics (brighter lines at higher frequencies), the letter "M" seems to have a bigger second harmonic. The frequency scale is not calibrated correctly (cheap iPhone app...)

Here are two other shots, side by side (M, then A). You can see that the 2nd harmonic of the M is bigger than the first; by contrast, the higher harmonics from the A are dropping off more slowly: enter image description here enter image description here

Simple vowels have this in common: the shape of your mouth changes the relative intensity of harmonics, and your ear is good at picking that up. Incidentally, this is the reason that it is sometimes hard to understand what a soprano is singing - at the top of her range, the frequencies that help you differentiate the different vowels might be "out of range" for your ears.

For short ("plosive") consonants (P, T, B, K etc), the story is a bit more complicated, as the frequency content changes during the sounding of the letter. But then it's hard to "sing" the letter P... you could sing "peeeee", but then it's the "E" that carries the pitch.

The app I used for this is SignalSpy - I am not affiliated with it in any way.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ wait a minute… your base tone reaches as low as 15 hz? or the sonogram (first picture) has wrong numbers on the scale? $\endgroup$ Commented May 28, 2017 at 6:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ btw, there exists free software which can generate these pictures too. Audacity for example. $\endgroup$ Commented May 28, 2017 at 7:02
  • $\begingroup$ @SargeBorsch the log scale numbers are off by a factor 10 I believe (I did say "the frequency scale is not calibrated correctly") - see the other plots which have frequency 10x higher. I had heard of Audacity but haven't tried to find/use it. $\endgroup$
    – Floris
    Commented May 28, 2017 at 12:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @theonlygusti Are you making a joke? 15 Hz is nearly an octave below the lowest note on the piano and is lower than the lower limit of human hearing. I doubt you can sing that low - but, since no one could hear you anyway, I guess no one can say you can't! $\endgroup$
    – pwf
    Commented Jun 2, 2017 at 4:14
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @theonlygusti - I assume you are referring to this Guinness World Record. Yet according to this NPR article (which has a later date) the lowest note Tim Storm (same guy) has ever "sung" for a recording is the low E - 41 Hz. Which is very low, but a lot more believable. If I go "ha...ha...ha" once every 10 seconds, I would "sing" 0.1 Hz according to the equipment used for the 0.189 Hz claim... $\endgroup$
    – Floris
    Commented Jun 2, 2017 at 17:17

The basic frequency is determined by the vocal cords. They make the air flow pulsate with a frequency of 100 Hz to 200 Hz. The pulses are short, so there are overtones upp to several kHz.

The mouth and tongue make the vocal tract resonant at different frequency ranges. Those are called formants. Have a look at the formant map here: https://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/physics/staff/academic/bell/sonify/ttm/sound_files/


Here's something different to note. Let's say I would tell a band to play the musical note "C3". The bass, the guitar, the piano, the voice, the banjo, all of them sound different and yet we perceive them as the same note that has been played.

Similar, think of a sung "A" and a sung "B" (as in "bee") as an instrument respectively. They have their own unique "sound" to them, and yet they can both be used to create the same "musical note" of a certain given pitch and volume.

What makes a C3 note of a sung "A" different from a C3 note from a sung "B" then? (Or what makes a C3 of a piano different from a C3 of a guitar?)

Note what "same pitch and volume" actually means. I'll keep it simple.

Pitch: perceived frequency

Volume: air pressure or amplitude

Here are two pictures to illustrate what I mean:

enter image description here enter image description here

Both of them have the same amplitude, or volume.

Both of them have the same perceived frequency, or pitch.

Thus both of them play the same musical note we perceive.

But looking at the wave form, you could probably tell that they will sound differently, even though we would perceive them as the same note.

This difference is similar to a piano C3 vs a guitar C3.

Essentially: The same perceived frequency and air pressure creates the illusion of the same musical note perceived by a listener. Completely different wave forms (sounds) can be perceived as the same musical note, as long as their wave form "look the same" (the two pictures above illustrated what I mean with that).

So a sung "A" and a sung "B" are actually quite different from each other. But if sang with the same pitch, they will produce the same musical sound (as perceived by humans).

Source of the images used

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! Thinking about it from an instrumental perspective makes it so much clearer. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 2, 2017 at 2:58

Letters, physical sounds, and the sounds that we hear
Let me remark first that many languages (and notably English) do not have a one-to-one correspoindence with the sounds. In other words, letters are symbols, and some of them or groups of letters may correspond to several sounds, and same sound can be sometimes represented by different (combinations of) letter.

Studying how different sounds are produced is called phonetics. Note that this is different from phonology, which studies the systems of sounds used by particular languages. Although all humans, in principle, are capable of producing and distinguishing the similar range of sounds, many of them will be treated as one sound by a specific langauge (allophones). As the sound system is learned in the early childhood, we quickly lose the ability to differentiate the sounds that are considered as one by our native language.

(My personal experience is that literate people often fail even to hear the sounds of their own language, as their thinking is too focused on how the word is spelled. Trying to teach a foreigner your language quickly uncovers it.)

Sound spectrum
Being acoustic waves, sounds principally differ in their amplitude and spectrum. Apart from tonal languages (such as Chinese), the volume of a sound usually indicates stress, whereas its pitch (i.e., its relative position on the frequency scale) does not change the meaning of the sound. Thus, the main distinctions between the sounds have to do with the shape of their spectra, which is controlled via the articulation.

It is necessary to distinguish vowels and consonants. Vowels are the sounds that can be sounded continuously - they are essentially modulated frequency waves, similar to those produces by brass musical instruments. Just like with the muscial instruments, the quality of a vowel is controlled by the shape of the resonator, that is our oral cavity. Vowels are usually by the position of the tongue (high/low and front/back), by the position of the lips (roudned/unrounded), and by whether the air stream passes through the nose or not (nasal and not).

Consonants differ from vowels by the associated movements of the speech organs - e.g., by sudden release of air (plosive consonants), by rythmic vibrations of tongue (such as versions of r in different langauges), etc. Their classification is more complex than that of vowels but also well established (see the WIkipedia article cited in the beginning). Consonants are thus associated with short pulses or series of pulses (as opposed to the continuously sounded vowels).


  • Continuously sounding M, as suggested in the OP, likely means continuously sounding a nasal vowel rather than actually M, which is formed by a sudden air release when opening lips.
  • I stress again that the discussion above does not apply to all the languages, wome of which use pitch (like Chinese) or even clicks to convey ifnormation (some African languages). The discussion however applies to all the Indo-European languages, such as English, French, Russian, Persian, Hindi and many others - I suppose that the readers master at least English.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.