I'm working with modern physics atm, and can't seem to wrap my head around the binding energies of some molecules.

At first, I thought that a negative binding energy = unstable molecule, and a positive binding energy = stable molecule.

But for example, Cobalt-60 is a radioactive (unstable) isotope and has a positive binding energy. But deuterium, which is a stable isotope of hydrogen, also has a positive binding energy. How is this possible? If both a stable and an unstable molecule can have a positive binding energy, what does it mean if a binding energy is negative/positive? What's the physical meaning? See calculations below:

$$Mass[27 protons] + Mass[33 neutrons] - Mass[Cobalt-60] = 27*1.00727647+33*1.00866501-59.9338222=0.5485...$$ $$Mass[1 proton] + Mass[1 neutron] - Mass[Deuterium] = 1*1.00727647+1*1.00866501-2.01410178=0.0018...$$


Nature tends to the lowest energy state possible. Therefore stable bound states have negative binding energy.

As an example, deuterium is stable against breaking up into a proton and a neutron since

$$m_d-m_p-m_n = 1876.12 \textrm{ MeV } - 938.27 \textrm{ MeV } - 939.57 \textrm{ MeV } = -1.72 \textrm{ MeV}.$$

Similarly, $^{60}$Co is stable against breaking up into its constituent protons and neutrons,

$$m_{^{60}\mathrm{Co}}-27m_p-33m_n=-511\textrm{ MeV}.$$

However, $^{60}$Co is unstable against decay to $^{60}$Ni

$$m_{^{60}\mathrm{Co}}-m_{^{60}\mathrm{Ni}}=2.83\textrm{ MeV};$$

i.e. every $^{60}$Co nucleus that decays to $^{60}$Ni releases 2.83 MeV of energy.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.