6
$\begingroup$

Consider a system in which the total force acting on the system consists of conservative forces $F'$ and frictional forces $f^i$, where $f^i$ depends on velocity. It is to show that for such a system the virial theorem holds in the form $$\overline{T}~=~-\frac{1}{2}\sum\overline{{F_i}'\cdot r_i}. \tag{1}$$

I defined a quantity $$G=\sum_i p_i\cdot r_i. \tag{2}$$ The total force on the system $$\dot{p_i}=F=F_i'+f_i.\tag{3}$$

Taking time derivative of $G$ and time averaging over limit $0$ to $\tau$. If the Time period is taken to be too large or periodic the time average of $\frac{dG}{dt}$ vanishes. To show the virial theorem holds, all I have to prove that the time average of $\sum{f_i.\dot{r_i}}$ over time period which goes to infinity or the system is periodic in $\tau$ is zero.

i.e, $$\frac{1}{\tau}\int_{0}^{\tau}{f_i(\dot{r_i})}.\dot{r_i}dt\tag{4}$$ is zero in the limit $\tau\to\infty$ or $\tau$ is periodic. But how can I prove it. For the simple case, If I take $f_i(\dot{r_i})=\dot{r}_i$, so the integral becomes, $$\frac{1}{\tau}\int_{0}^{\tau}{\dot{r_i}}^2dt\tag{5}$$ I don't know how to proceed from here.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

In this answer we just recall the standard approach, which works for a friction force of the form $$\vec{f}_i~=~-k_i \vec{v}_i,\tag{A}$$ where $k_i$ is a constant (which may depend on the $i$'th particle), i.e. Stokes' drag.

  1. Firstly, improve/change/replace the virial quantity $G$ in eq. (2) into $$G~:=~\sum_i \left\{\vec{p}_i\cdot \vec{r}_i+\frac{1}{2}k_i r_i^2\right\},\tag{B}$$ so that the time-derivative becomes independent of friction force: $$\begin{align} \dot{G}~\stackrel{(B)}{=}~&\sum_i \left\{\vec{p}_i \cdot \vec{v}_i+(\dot{\vec{p}}_i+k_i \vec{v}_i)\cdot \vec{r}_i\right\}\cr ~\stackrel{(A)+(3)}{=}&2T+\sum_i \vec{F}^{\prime}_i\cdot \vec{r}_i.\end{align}\tag{C}$$
  2. Secondly, invoke reasonable assumptions about the improved $G$ (periodicity or boundedness, so that the left-hand side of eq. (C) vanishes in time average) to show the virial theorem (1).
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.