1
$\begingroup$

I have spent the past two and a half hours attempting to understand why the electric field on either side of an infinitely sized charged plate is uniform. I get it conceptually, in that as a point moves farther away from the plate, it is able to see a greater amount of charge in a more focused field of view, canceling out the reduction in strength caused by increasing the distance between the point and the plate. My issue is that I want to be able to derive this relationship for myself using calculus and I when doing it by hand, I always arrive at a relationship that reduces the strength of the electric field as the distance increases.

I eventually found a paper online that derives the property of uniformity, but it has a step when evaluating an improper integral that makes no sense to me:

$$ \begin{align} E_P &= \frac{\sigma r}{4\pi\epsilon} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{1}{(x^2 + y^2 + r^2)^{3/2}} \; dx \; dy \\ &= \frac{\sigma r}{4\pi\epsilon} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{2}{(y^2 + r^2)^{3/2}} \; dy \tag{1} \\ &= \frac{\sigma r}{4\pi\epsilon} \frac{2\pi}{r} \tag{2} \\ &= \frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon} \end{align} $$

What happened between lines (1) and (2)? When I did it by hand, I ended up with, $$ \frac{\sigma r}{4\pi\epsilon} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{2}{(y^2 + r^2)^{3/2}} \; dy = \frac{\sigma r}{4\pi\epsilon} \frac{4}{r^2} = \frac{4\sigma}{r\pi\epsilon} $$

I checked this result with Maxima and Wolfram, and they both confirm my answer. What am I not seeing?

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

Consider the transition from the line above (1) to line (1). Based on my calculation, line (1) should be $$E_P = \frac{\sigma r}{4 \pi \epsilon} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac {2}{(r^2 + y^2)} dy $$

This gives the appropriate result in line (2) and the final answer.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you, I'll see if I can notify the maintainer of the document to fix the typo. $\endgroup$
    – Tankobot
    May 22, 2017 at 8:04
0
$\begingroup$

You're right, something seems to be mixed up. I'd always integrate this in a different way: $$\begin{align} E_P&=&\frac{r \sigma}{4 \pi \epsilon_0}\int_{-\infty}^\infty\mathrm{d}x\int_{-\infty}^\infty\mathrm{d}y \frac{1}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2+r^2}^3}\\ &=&\frac{r \sigma}{4 \pi \epsilon_0}\int_{0}^\infty2\pi \rho\mathrm{d}\rho \frac{1}{\sqrt{\rho^2+r^2}^3}\\ &=&\frac{r \sigma}{2 \epsilon_0}\int_{0}^\infty \frac{\rho\mathrm{d}\rho}{\sqrt{\rho^2+r^2}^3}\\ &=&\frac{r \sigma}{2 \epsilon_0} \frac{1}{r}\\ &=&\frac{\sigma}{2 \epsilon_0} \end{align} $$ i.e. using symmetry again and changing to cylindrical coordinates.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.