9
$\begingroup$

I heard that a symplectic integration algorithm has a property related to the phase space of a system, but i don't understand much further than that.

I'm interested in applying that method to a non-linear and forced oscillator, but I don't know what advantages it has over the Runge-Kutta method.

I would appreciate an explanation.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Secondary conservation of things like kinetic energy. Not at a computer now so I can't write a full answer. Hopefully somebody can take the comment and run with it! $\endgroup$
    – tpg2114
    May 18, 2017 at 23:52
  • $\begingroup$ @tpg2114 I think you mean conservation of total system energy. $\endgroup$
    – Rumplestillskin
    May 19, 2017 at 0:00
  • $\begingroup$ @Rumplestillskin For purely kinetic systems, they are equivalent. But I recall for something like Navier-Stokes/Euler equations, total energy is directly conserved (there is an equation for it after all) but kinetic energy is not unless sympectic integrators are used. So although total energy is okay, you get a kinetic<->internal conversion that shouldn't happen. I'd have to go back to my notes to verify that though. Your answer is spot on though. $\endgroup$
    – tpg2114
    May 19, 2017 at 0:26
  • $\begingroup$ @tpg2114 Ah okay, I wasn't aware! Sounds interesting though! $\endgroup$
    – Rumplestillskin
    May 19, 2017 at 0:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Note: RK4 is MUCH more complicated than symplectic Euler! $\endgroup$
    – user12029
    May 19, 2017 at 1:37

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
6
$\begingroup$

With symplectic integration schemes you are concerned with preserving the flow $\varphi(t)$ of your hamiltonian which is defined as a symplectic transformation. Classical integration schemes such as RK4 do not necessarily preserve this. The flow of a system is a mapping which progresses the solution over a time $t$. If you you have a Hamiltonian system with an initial condition given by $$ y(0) = (p(0),q(0))^T,$$ then we define the flow as $$ \varphi(y(0)) = y(t).$$ Mathematical we say

$$ \det \dot{\varphi} =1. $$ There are many advantages over using a symplectic integration scheme for e.g. conserving first integrals and long term stability due to the preservation of the flow.

To illustrate with an example consider orbital motion given by the simple Kepler problem with associated Hamiltonian

$$H(p_i,q_i) = \frac{(p_1^2+p_2^2+p_3^2)}{2} - \frac{1}{\sqrt{q_1^2+q_2^2+q_3^2}},$$

where we have set $GM=1$. Applying the following values $q = (0.8, 0.6, 0),p = (0, 1, 0.5)$ and subjecting the hamiltonian to a first order explicit RK and also a first order symplectic Euler scheme we have the following output: enter image description hereenter image description here

Another great advangtage is the fact that symplectic integration schemes prserve conserved quantities such as total system energy and angular momentum. See below for a plot:enter image description hereenter image description here

So in the first two images we can see that the flow remains invariant for the symplectic scheme as we know the solution to the Kepler problem is a ellipse. Secondly we can see that over the whole simulation, using the symplectic scheme the change in energy remains at zero correct to 3 decimal places.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.