4
$\begingroup$

I am studying the multipole expansion of electromagnetic wave radiation pattern, and it is said that any fields can be decomposed into the spherical harmonics $Y_{lm}$.

However, for $l=1$, which corresponds to a dipole, the spherical harmonics looks like a dumbbell, as shown in the attached picture, but we know that an electric dipole should have a doughnut shape radiation pattern, I don't understand why they don't match, is there any relationship between them?

 spherical harmonics dipole radiation pattern
$$ \begin{array}{cc} \left(\textbf{A}\right)~\text{spherical harmonics} & \left(\textbf{B}\right)~\text{dipole radiation pattern} \\ \hspace{300px} & \hspace{300px} \end{array} $$

|cite|improve this question
$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

The second plot you show is a generalization of the $Y_{lm}$ - it's a vector spherical harmonic; in addition, it differs from the electrostatic case in that the radial dependence is no longer a harmonic function (i.e. a solution to the Laplace equation), and it has been replaced by a wave solution (a spherical Bessel function, a solution to the monochromatic wave equation).

You can go into more mathsy detail if you really want (e.g. this for the general formalism, or this when you specialize to $l=1$ and stop caring about formal identification as spherical harmonics), but that's the core of the difference between those two.

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ thanks for the reply, I have been reading Jackson's book, it says the radial dependence is separated from the angular components, and both the radiation pattern and spherical harmonics are functions of angles ($\theta$,$\phi$), so I don't understand how the difference in the radial dependence solves this issue, sorry. $\endgroup$ – Zhijie Ma May 17 '17 at 10:23
  • $\begingroup$ The difference in the radial dependence doesn't much solve the issue - it's the shift to the vector spherical harmonics, $\mathbf X_{lm}=\hat{\mathbf L}Y_{lm} = \mathbf r\times\nabla Y_{lm}$ and its curl, that changes the angular dependence. $\endgroup$ – Emilio Pisanty May 17 '17 at 10:30
  • $\begingroup$ thanks, is there anyway we can visualise the vector spherical harmonics angular distributions? I really want to compare whether it is the same as the radiation patterns of an electric dipole (a donut) or quadrupole (four lobes). $\endgroup$ – Zhijie Ma May 17 '17 at 13:18
  • $\begingroup$ It's a bit trickier because you need to decide exactly what you're plotting (i.e. the radiation field is a three-dimensional vector-valued field; you can plot the norm of the field but that does not always carry all the information you need), but yes, you can take the electric field from Wikipedia, $$\mathbf E(\mathbf r,t) = A_0 \mathrm{Re}\left[i\nabla\times (h_{1}^{(1)}(kr) \mathbf X_{10}(\theta,\phi)e^{-i\omega t}\right],$$ and analyze it to your heart's content. $\endgroup$ – Emilio Pisanty May 17 '17 at 13:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.