4
$\begingroup$

Faraday's law needs a closed loop $\partial\Sigma$ in order to be applied (so as to be able to calculate the magnetic flux across $\Sigma$). However, $\partial\Sigma$ is just, at least according to my present comprehension, a mathematical object; nonetheless, in textbooks it often coincides with a physical object like a closed loop of wire. So my question is: does the physical wire have to be a closed loop or can it have discontinuities?

For example, if we consider a ring with a small discontinuity at some point, can we compute $-\partial\phi_B/\partial t$ across the surface described by the "convex envelope" of the wire (let's assume the ring lies on a single plane) in order to get the $\Delta V$ between the two open ends of the ring?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What does "$\Delta V$ between the two open ends of the ring" mean in a dynamical situation, and what makes you think that you can even define it? $\endgroup$ – Emilio Pisanty May 14 '17 at 12:45
  • $\begingroup$ It could be defined operatively as whatever is measured by a voltmeter connected to the two ends, or alternatively as $iR$, where $i$ is the current that would flow if the ring were closed with a conductor of negligible resistance, and $R$ is the resistance of the ring $\endgroup$ – MarcoV May 14 '17 at 12:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Neither of those is a complete definition, as they rely on an implicit understanding of the path used to close the circuit, and the choice of such a path has complete control of what gets measured. The potential difference between two points is meaningless in a dynamical situation, because the EMF on an open curve depends on the choice of path - that's precisely what Faraday's law is trying to tell you. $\endgroup$ – Emilio Pisanty May 14 '17 at 14:35
4
$\begingroup$

Faraday's Law relates the EMF in a closed loop to the flux through any surface having that loop as its boundary, but one can still use it to compute the EMF in, say, a wire segment by including that segment as part of a mathematical loop that is closed.

Consider, for example, a wire segment of length $\ell$ moving in the $x$-$y$ plane in the positive $x$-direction through a uniform field $-B\hat{\mathbf z}$. One can directly compute the EMF in this loop using the Lorentz force Law. The EMF is, by definition, the work per unit charge performed by the electromagnetic fields on a charge that is stationary relative to the segment, moving with the segment $$ \mathscr E = \frac{\text{Lorentz Force}\cdot\text{path vector}}{q} = \frac{[q(v\hat{\mathbf x})\times (-B\hat{\mathbf z})]\cdot(\ell\hat{\mathbf y})}{q} = \frac{qvB\ell}{q} = vB\ell $$ On the other hand, suppose that this segment is considered as one side of a mathematical rectangle in the $x$-$y$ plane with dimensions $\ell\times(\ell_0 + vt)$ and therefore with area $A_t = \ell(\ell_0 + vt)$, then the EMF in the loop computed via Faraday's Law is $$ \mathscr E = -\frac{d\Phi}{dt} = -\frac{d}{dt}[(-B\hat{\mathbf z})\cdot (A_t\hat{\mathbf z})] = -\frac{d}{dt}(-B\ell(\ell_0 + vt)) = vB\ell $$ We obtain the same result! This is often called motional EMF.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hi Josh, I was just re-reading and enjoying an answer of yours from about 4 years ago and found myself wishing that you would return. And not 5 minutes later, I came upon this question. Welcome back! $\endgroup$ – Alfred Centauri May 13 '17 at 23:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That's sweet. Yeah I've been busy :(, but I still browse a lot. Just had a question-answering itch to scratch this morning for some reason. $\endgroup$ – joshphysics May 13 '17 at 23:04
  • $\begingroup$ @AlfredCentauri I... love you too ;) $\endgroup$ – Physiks lover May 27 '17 at 17:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.