0
$\begingroup$

Mawell Equations, in a particular unit system, are: \begin{eqnarray} \nabla \cdot \vec{E} &=& \rho &(1)\\ \nabla \times \vec{B} &=& \frac{\partial \vec{E}}{\partial t} + \vec{J}&(2)\\ \nabla \cdot \vec{B} &=& 0&(3)\\ \nabla \times \vec{E} &=& -\frac{\partial \vec{B}}{\partial t}&(4)\\ \end{eqnarray}

If we introduce the matriz $$ F^{\alpha\beta} = \left( \begin{array}{cccc} 0 & E_x & E_y & E_z \\ -E_x & 0 & B_z & -B_y \\ -E_y & -B_z & 0 & B_x \\ -E_z & B_y & -B_x & 0\\ \end{array}\right)~(5)$$

I derived that, Maxwell's equations (1) and (2) are simplified in $\partial_\alpha F^{\alpha\beta} = -J^\beta$. But, S. Weinberg also say that, Maxwell's equations (3) and (4) are simplified in the form $$ \epsilon^{\alpha\beta\gamma\delta} \partial_\beta F_{\gamma\delta} = 0 $$

How can I derived this last equation?

$\endgroup$
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Hint: Choose $\alpha = 0$ in $\epsilon^{\alpha \beta \gamma \delta}$ and verify that this equation is $\nabla . B = 0$. In the same way, choose $\alpha = i$ for $i=1,2,3$ and show that you get $\nabla \times E = \dot{B}$. $\endgroup$ – OkThen May 11 '17 at 20:09
  • $\begingroup$ Corresponding Lagrangian story: physics.stackexchange.com/q/71611/2451 $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Mar 16 '18 at 19:19
1
$\begingroup$

This equation is derived the same way as the first one but considering instead the Dual Electromagnetic tensor:

$G^{\mu\nu} = \frac{1}{2}\epsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}F_{\alpha\beta}$

Where $\epsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}$ is the totally anti symmetric tensor.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.