I am tasked with the following question:

Find the wavelengths of the first four members of the Brackett series in $\mathrm{He}^{+}$ – the set of spectral lines corresponding to transitions from $n \gt 4$ to $n = 4$.

In order to find the wavelengths it was my understanding that the relevant formula to use is


Rearranging, $$\lambda=\frac{1}{R_{\infty}}\left(\frac{16n^2}{n^2-16}\right)$$ and taking the Rydberg constant $R_\infty$ to be $1.0974\times 10^7\text{m}^{-1}$

Then $n=8\rightarrow 4\implies \lambda\approx 1940\,\text{nm}$

and $n=7\rightarrow 4\implies \lambda\approx 2165\,\text{nm}$

and $n=6\rightarrow 4\implies \lambda\approx 2624\,\text{nm}$

and $n=5\rightarrow 4\implies \lambda\approx 4050\,\text{nm}$

The problem is that the answer is:

The wavelengths are given by $$\frac{1}{\lambda}=Rhc\left(\frac{1}{4^2}-\frac{1}{n^2}\right)$$ with $$Rhc=\frac{1}{91.1\,\text{nm}}$$ So the wavelengths are $1012\,\text{nm}$ ($n=5$ to $n=4$), $656\,\text{nm}$ ($n=6$ to $n=4$) and $541\,\text{nm}$

($n=7$ to $n=4$)

The formula that has been given in the answer I understood to be the change in energy $\Delta E$ when a transition takes place.

I am almost certain that $(1)$ is the correct formula to use (but it is apparently giving me the wrong results) unless there is something else I am missing.

Where am I going wrong?


The Rydberg formula has to be adjusted to that the nuclear charge $Z=2$. For hydrogen like ions (single electron + nucleus), the electron energies are proportional to $Z^2$, so you should multiply $R_{\infty}$ by four.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Thanks, that now gives the correct results. Any idea why the author is writing $Rhc$ instead of $Z^2\,R_{\infty}$? $\endgroup$ – BLAZE May 6 '17 at 22:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @BLAZE Wild guess: it was supposed to be $R_\text{He}$ and was mis-transcribed somewhere in the editing process. Note that $Rhc$, for the usual $hc = 1240\rm\,eV\,fm$, doesn't have units of inverse length, so your text's solution must contain at least one error. $\endgroup$ – rob May 7 '17 at 8:49

The general formula to calculate the wavelength of a hydrogen like species is $$\frac1\lambda=R_H\times z²\left(\frac{1}{n_i^2}-\frac{1}{n_f^2}\right)$$ where z is the atomic number of the species which in your case is equal to 2 for $He^+$ and $n_i$ and $n_f$ are the respective energy levels in the transition and $R_H$ is the Rydberg Constant for hydrogen atom.

  • $\begingroup$ What is $R_H$ equal to here? $\endgroup$ – BLAZE May 6 '17 at 22:45
  • $\begingroup$ It is the Rydberg Constant =1.0974×$10^7$ per metre $\endgroup$ – Kira May 6 '17 at 22:48
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Okay, this hasn't really told me anything that I didn't already know, but do you know why the author writes $Rhc$ instead of $z^2\,R_H$? Possible error? $\endgroup$ – BLAZE May 6 '17 at 22:52
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ That has to be a typo but you can guess why those particular quantities appeared in the typo by looking at the derivation of the value of $R_H$ which is equal to $\frac {E_1}{hc}$ where $E_1$ is the energy of first orbit of hydrogen atom,h the Planck's contact and c the speed of light in vacuum $\endgroup$ – Kira May 6 '17 at 23:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Well done Kira, I managed to finally contact my lecturer to ask him about this error, and it turns out it was exactly as you pointed out :-) $\endgroup$ – BLAZE May 8 '17 at 0:20

Okay so just a wild guess at why your book says $Rhc$ instead of $R$ as you mentioned in the comments. It might be $R_Hc$ where $R_H$ is the Rydberg's constant and $c$ is the speed of light.

I believe it could be because it's dealing with the frequency on the left hand side? Because we know that $\frac{c}{\lambda}$ = $\nu$ (where the symbols have their usual meanings).

Your book might want to say that

$$\nu= R_H\cdot c\left(\frac{1}{{n_i}^2}−\frac{1}{{n_f}^2}\right)Z^2$$

The symbols for frequency and wavenumber are very similar. The first is $\nu$ and the other is $\bar\nu$

  • $\begingroup$ Or it could be as @rob pointed out. $\endgroup$ – Kunal Pawar May 7 '17 at 10:18

protected by Qmechanic May 7 '17 at 7:33

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.