-1
$\begingroup$

I'm having some difficulty understanding why the $\rho^0$$\rightarrow$$\pi^+ \pi^-$ decay conserves parity.

By my understanding, the parity of a meson is given by $P_aP_b(-1)^{L+1}$ and the parity of a two-body state is given by $P_cP_d(-1)^L$

Angular momentum of $\rho=1$ and spin of $\pi=0$ so the final state must have $L=L_{\pi^+}+L_{\pi^-}=1$

Thus total parity for the final $\pi^+\pi^-$ system is given by

$P_{\pi^+}P_{\pi^-}(-1)^L=P_uP_\bar{d}(-1)^{L_{\pi^+}+1}P_{\bar{d}}P_d(-1)^{L_{\pi^-}+1}(-1)^1=1$

since fermions and antifermions have parity $1$ and $-1$ respectively

But the parity of $\rho=-1$ if $L_{\rho}=0,S_{\rho}=1$ so parity isn't conserved

What am I missing?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ It's unclear what you are throwing on the table indiscriminately. The parity of ρ is -1, and that equals that of the ππ state, (-)(-)(-)=-, the last - from the L=1. As a separate point, reassure yourself the parity of the ρ is -1. Its constituents are in a spin triplet, L-singlet (s-wave) state, so its parity is -1. $\endgroup$ May 6, 2017 at 21:46
  • $\begingroup$ I understand why $P_{\rho}=-$, but could you please explain why the $\pi\pi$ state is also $-$, without prior knowledge of pion parity? As I say in my question, assuming the parity of a fermion is $+$ and an antifermion $-$, the equation stated gives parity of the final state as $+$. $\endgroup$
    – jomobro
    May 6, 2017 at 21:51
  • $\begingroup$ ? the parity of the π is the same as that of the ρ for the same reason: s-state. Think of parapositronium versus orthopositronium. The only non vanishing L is in the spatial wavefunction of two pions. That is my point about the deep malformation of your question. $\endgroup$ May 7, 2017 at 0:38

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

I am summarizing my comments only to prevent the systematic abuse of a terminology malforming the question; in particular, its erroneous $L=L_{\pi^+}+L_{\pi^-}=1$ part.

Indeed, the (intrinsic) parity of a meson is $(-1)^{L+1}$ where L is the angular momentum of the wavefunction of the quark-antiquark pair. Both the orthoquarkonium and the paraquarkonium, the $\rho$ and the $\pi$, are in s-wave, so, then, the respective L=0 ; and they consequently both have negative parity, $P_\rho=P_\pi=-1$. It is the spin wavefunction that gives the $\rho$ its J and denies it to the pions, but that does not affect parity.

Since the parity of a two-body state is given by $P_cP_d(-1)^L$, and the L of the two-pion wavefunction =1, so as to produce a J=1 particle out of two spinless particles, $$ P_{\pi\pi}=P_\pi P_\pi (-)^{-1}=-1 =P_\rho, $$ as required in a strong decay.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ FYI, my question comes directly from a degree program question paper with solutions, so I'm unsure what exactly you're referring to with regard to erroneous information. $\endgroup$
    – jomobro
    May 7, 2017 at 15:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm not that interested, but it might help (if the bizarre erroneous equation I single out above were part of a writeup by a responsible party) to quote it so as to note the context of it. I suspect no instructor wrote it down. $\endgroup$ May 7, 2017 at 16:26
-2
$\begingroup$

Turns out what I was missing was the presence of a gluon decaying into a $d\bar{d}$ pair, with the gluon adding an extra $(-1)$ term to the total parity equation.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.