1
$\begingroup$

First off, if this isn't the proper stack for this, I apologize, but since my question isn't based around code, I think this is the proper place.

I am making a system based around a 3 DOF accelerometer to track earthquakes. I take the magnitude of the three axis: mag = sqrt(x^2 + y^2 + z^2). I then take a moving average of 64 points of the data. I get great noise reduction from this method.

My question is on the baseline value of the accelerometer readings. It is my understanding, that since I take the magnitude of the 3 axis, that at any given location, the orientation of the accelerometer shouldn't affect the magnitude?

The problem I have, is that it seems to depend greatly on the orientation, and I can't see why. Here is a great example: Img1

I shook the table that the acc was on, gives a great image of the vibration, but it doesn't return to the original baseline. This same type of behavior happens if I spin it, raise or lower it, ect..

I am using a Invensense MPU-6050 accelerometer. I do have access to other 3 DOF gyro, maybe that could be helpful? I didn't think so since I don't need exact orientation out of it.

Thanks a lot.

EDIT: Based on the suggestions below, I secured the acc to the table, ensuring the orientation didn't change, and this is the result: enter image description here

Moved back to baseline exactly. So it seems like it's a calibration issue.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Happy to see that you checked the suggestion and reported back what you learnt. That makes the question more useful for future visitors. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – Floris May 5 '17 at 19:33
0
$\begingroup$

Is the orientation of the sensor different after the shake? If not - did you calibrate the sensitivity of the axes? This looks like you have an uncalibrated sensor with changing orientation - so the same acceleration (of gravity) shows up as a slightly different number when pointing along x, y or z.

A well calibrated sensor should give the same reading (at rest) regardless of orientation. If it does not, you could deliberately orient in so $g$ points along x, y and z - then compute the scale factor needed so the three axes read the same thing.

Then when you combine your three signals, use

$$a = \sqrt{(c_x\cdot x)^2 + (c_y\cdot y)^2 + (c_z\cdot z)^2}$$

Where the $c_x$ etc are the calibration factors you found.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, didn't even think about calibration since I had assumed I didn't need to since I dont need absolute values. Is this something that can be done without manually moving it? Since this system needs to be able to run without much setup. As far as I could tell, the orientation did not change. @Floris $\endgroup$ – Kyle Hunter May 5 '17 at 18:44
  • $\begingroup$ I dunno. It seems like a rather big change in the baseline value due to shaking to be caused by an x-y-z calibration problem. The baseline appears to change by about 6%, which is a lot. And that's not a 6% change in tilting the accelerometer by 90˚ so that its measuring acceleration along its own z-axis and then along its own x-axis. No, it's a 6% change which would presumably be due to a very slight angular misorientation of perhaps a degree or so as a result of the table or accelerometer settling to a slightly different angle after the shaking event. $\endgroup$ – Samuel Weir May 5 '17 at 19:19
  • $\begingroup$ @SamuelWeir Check my edited question. I'm guessing that it rotated quite a bit when I shook it last time. Will look into the calibration issue now. $\endgroup$ – Kyle Hunter May 5 '17 at 19:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.