-1
$\begingroup$

the question I am trying to answer is:

Show that for any not explicitly time-dependent operator $\hat A$,

$$\frac{d}{dt} \langle \hat A \rangle = \frac{i}{\hbar} \langle \psi | [\hat H, \hat A]| \psi \rangle .$$ Use this relation to show that $\langle \hat A \rangle$ does not change whenever the system is in a stationary state.

I know how to show the relation, using the product rule on $\frac{d}{dt} \langle \psi | \hat A | \psi \rangle$, and using the Schrodinger equation to evaluate each term.

$$\frac{d}{dt} \langle \psi | \hat A | \psi \rangle = (\frac{d}{dt} \langle \psi |) \hat A | \psi \rangle + \langle \psi | \frac{d}{dt}\hat A | \psi \rangle + \langle \psi | \hat A \frac{d}{dt}| \psi \rangle$$

$$\frac{d}{dt}| \psi \rangle = - \frac{i}{\hbar} \hat H | \psi \rangle$$

$$ \frac{d}{dt} \langle \psi | = \frac{i}{\hbar} \langle \psi | \hat H$$

$$\frac{d}{dt} \hat A = 0$$

$$\frac{d}{dt} \langle \psi | \hat A | \psi \rangle = \frac{i}{\hbar} (\langle \psi | \hat H \hat A | \psi \rangle - \langle \psi | \hat A \hat H | \psi \rangle) = \frac{i}{\hbar} \langle \psi | [\hat H, \hat A] | \psi \rangle$$

I am unsure of how to show that $\frac{d}{dt} \langle \hat A \rangle = 0$ for the second part of the question.

Clearly, if $\hat A$ commutes with the hamiltonian, then this will be true since $\langle \psi | 0 | \psi \rangle = 0$. But I don't think I can assume this to be the case.

Thanks, I hope that makes sense.

Jacob

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I have tried to improve my question. Please let me know if you think it needs further work. $\endgroup$ – jm22b May 4 '17 at 12:57
1
$\begingroup$

For a stationary state, $\vert\psi\rangle=e^{-iEt/\hbar}\vert E\rangle$ with $\vert E\rangle$ an eigenstate of $\hat H$ with eigenvalue $E$. Then $$ \langle \psi \vert \hat H\hat A\vert \psi\rangle= e^{iEt/\hbar}E \langle E \vert \hat A\vert E \rangle e^{-iEt/\hbar} =E \langle E \vert \hat A\vert E \rangle $$ which is time-independent. A similar result follows for $\langle \psi \vert \hat A \hat H\vert \psi\rangle$. The difference between the two is $0$.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

The key information here is that the system is in a stationary state. This implies that the system is in an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian. $$ \hat{H} |\psi\rangle = E |\psi\rangle$$ Plugging this into your expression pretty much gives you the answer.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I understand that $\hat A \hat H | \psi \rangle = \hat A E | \psi \rangle$, but I don't know about $\hat H \hat A | \psi \rangle$ $\endgroup$ – jm22b May 4 '17 at 13:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $\hat{H}$ is hermitian. Apply it to the left! $\endgroup$ – noah May 4 '17 at 13:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.