I was reading the Chapter 14 of the textbook by Philip Phillips on Advanced Solid State Physics, when he introduced the mean-field treatment of the quantum rotor model, he used the method first used in this paper: Quantum fluctuations in two-dimensional superconductors.
Here my question is related to the Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation (H-S transformation) used here to decouple the "spin" interaction:
$$ T_{\tau}\exp \left( \int_0^{\beta} d\tau\ \sum_k J_k \mathbf{S}_k(\tau)\cdot\mathbf{S}_k^*(\tau) \right)$$
here the $\mathbf{S}_k(\tau)$ is the operator written in the interaction picture, then he introduced the auxiliary field $\psi_k$:
$$T_{\tau}\exp \left( \int_0^{\beta} d\tau\ \sum_k J_k \mathbf{S}_k(\tau)\cdot\mathbf{S}_k^*(\tau) \right)=T_{\tau}\int D \psi_k(\tau) \ e^{-\int d\tau \sum_k \psi_k^*(\tau)\psi_k(\tau)-2\int_0^{\beta} d \tau \sum_k \psi_k(\tau)\cdot\mathbf{S}_{-k}(\tau) } $$
because I learned H-S transformation in the context of path integral, where we write the partition function in terms of functional integral over the fields ("numbers"). So here I want to ask:
- Mathematically if it is well defined to do the H-S transformation on top of operators?
- It seems that the imaginary time ordering operator does not affect the auxiliary field $\psi_k(\tau)$ (can be seen from later on derivations in the book), what's the reason for that?