3
$\begingroup$

Is it possible to add to a lagrangian a pseudoscalar mass term for the fermion: $$i M \bar{\psi} \gamma_5 \psi$$ The $i$ makes it hermitian. Would this cause any inconsistency in the field theory? If not, how would such a fermion differ from a regular fermion? For example, how would the propagator look like? Obviously this term breaks parity, but I don't see what it may not be included in a parity violating theory.

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

In fact, as long as you consider just the kinetic term plus your pseudo-mass term, there is no violation of parity. Indeed, your mass term can be written as $$ iM\bar{\psi}_L\psi_R+\mathrm{h.c.} $$ and one can clearly re-absorbe the $i$ into, say, $\psi_R$ that is $\psi_R\rightarrow -i\psi_R$ given that the kinetic term is left invariant under this transformation. So, despite the look, the mass you wrote is just a genuine Dirac masss term that respects parity.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ That's interesting. What if you have e.g., a $\phi \bar\psi_L \psi_R$? It turns into a pseudoscalar under the transformation? $\endgroup$
    – innisfree
    Commented Nov 13, 2017 at 23:07
  • $\begingroup$ @innisfree yes. Adding a real Yukawa term with $\phi$ a real scalar would correspond to introduce parity violation unless the $\phi$ can be assigned negative parity. For example, if $\phi$ has no other interactions than this Yukawa, you certainly can assign it negative parity making it that is pseudoscalar as you say. $\endgroup$
    – TwoBs
    Commented Nov 14, 2017 at 8:21
0
$\begingroup$

I was thinking about a similar questions these days. I am not an expert in the field, but my conclusion is that is theoretically possible, at least at first sight, as an effective Yukawa interaction. I am not sure if it will introduces inconsistencies.

A quick review of my thoughts: A Lagrangian is a scalar that must respect the symmetries of the spacetime, i.e: must be Lorentz-invariant and must respect CPT invariance. This leads to consider $\mathcal{L}=\mathcal{L}^\dagger$.

To answer the question properly lets generalize and consider a lagrangian for fermions $\psi$ of mass $M_\psi$ with two types of Yukawa interaction: a scalar interaction with the field $\phi$ and a scalar interaction with the field $\rho$. Consider those two fields real, for sake of simplicity.

$$ \mathcal{L}=\mathcal{L}_{Dirac} + \mathcal{L}_{KG, \phi} + \mathcal{L}_{KG, \rho} + a\phi\bar{\psi}\psi + b\rho\bar{\psi}\gamma^5\psi $$

Where, $\mathcal{L}_{Dirac}$ is the usual kinetic term for fermions and $\mathcal{L}_{KG}$ the usual kinetic term for mesons $\phi, \rho$.

In order to achieve $\mathcal{L}=\mathcal{L}^\dagger$ is required that $a\in\mathbb{R}$ and $b=ic, c\in\mathbb{R}$. We have a Yukawa-type interaction for the scalar messon with coupling $a$ and for the pseudoscalar meson of coupling $ic$. Consider those mesons to have mass $M_\phi$ and $M_\rho$ respectively. If we restrict ourselves to energies much lower than $M_\rho$ or $M_\phi$ we obtain an effective theory where the fields $\phi,\rho$ are non-dynamic, and we can set the value of those $a\phi=\Phi>0$ and $b\rho=iP$.

Then you achieve an effective theory of a fermion with a scalar mass term $(M_\psi+\Phi)\bar{\psi}\psi$ and a pseudoscalar mass term $iP\bar{\psi}\gamma^5\psi$ that violates parity.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.