Two masses $\mathrm{A}$ and $\mathrm{B}$ each of $5~\mathrm{kg}$ are suspended by a light inextensible string passing over a smooth, massless pulley such that mass $\mathrm{A}$ rests on a smooth table and $\mathrm{B}$ is held at the position as shown. Mass $\mathrm{B}$ is now gently lifted up to the pulley and allowed to fall from rest. Determine up to what height will $\mathrm{A}$ rise for ensuing motion.

Diagram -

Figure 1

Now, let us consider the moment when the string is about to become taut(when $\mathrm{B}$ comes down by $1~\mathrm{m}$):

Just before the string becomes taut, the velocity of $\mathrm{B}$ is $\sqrt{2g}$.

CASE I: If we apply the concept of impulse and conservation of momentum:

Let impulse received by $\mathrm{A}$ be $P$. Then impulse received by $\mathrm{B}$ is $-P$ (Since the tension in a massless string is same everywhere)

So, $$V_\mathrm{A}=\frac{P}{5}$$ and $$V_\mathrm{B} = \sqrt{(2g)} - \frac{P}{5} $$

From constraints, $V_\mathrm{A}=V_\mathrm{B}$

Solving, $$V_\mathrm{A}=\sqrt{\frac{g}{2}}$$

Then we can proceed further...

CASE II: If we apply conservation of energy:

$$\frac{1}{2} m V_{\mathrm{A,i}}^2 + \frac{1}{2} m V_{\mathrm{B,i}}^2 = \frac{1}{2} m V_{\mathrm{A,f}}^2 + \frac{1}{2} m V_{\mathrm{B,f}}^2$$

Now , $V_{\mathrm{A,i}}= 0$ and $V_{\mathrm{B,i}} = \sqrt{2g}$

and by constraints $V_{\mathrm{A,f}}= V_{\mathrm{B,f}}$.

Thus, by solving we get $$V_{\mathrm{A,f}} = V_{\mathrm{B,f}}=\sqrt{g}$$.

But why do CASE I and CASE II give different answers for $V_\mathrm{A}$ ?

  • $\begingroup$ Please use LaTeX. It is very difficult to read otherwise. $\endgroup$
    – user139621
    Apr 26 '17 at 4:48
  • $\begingroup$ This may be somewhat out of context to whatever book you're working from, but I'm a bit confused why you appear to be solving for $V_{af}$ at all. Think about this: what will be the velocity of A at its' maximum height? (You may not need to solve for it to come to the answer). $\endgroup$ Apr 26 '17 at 5:21
  • $\begingroup$ @user2027202827 I was able to solve the question. But I want to know why Case II won't work $\endgroup$ Apr 26 '17 at 5:23
  • $\begingroup$ Do you mind if I ask what solution you came up with? $\endgroup$ Apr 26 '17 at 5:30

This is really an inelastic collision type problem with kinetic energy not conserved.
Energy is conserved but the difficulty is that having an ideal system of masses and string makes it appear that energy is not conserved.
To this end you have to allow either the masses or the string or both to be distorted.
If you do not allow that to happen then you would have the impossible situation when the string first becomes taut, that the left hand mass is not moving and the right hand mass is moving and yet the separation of the masses (length of the string) is not changing.
Another possibility is that the support for the pulley or the pulley itself distorts.

Once you allow such distortions you could say that pulses/vibration are initiated and/or the distortions are permanent and these would account for the reduction in the kinetic energy.

  • $\begingroup$ Well explained. The key point here is : To conserve both energy and momentum one has to "allow either the masses or the string or both to be distorted". Saying the string is "inextensible" makes the question vague. $\endgroup$
    – user139621
    Apr 26 '17 at 6:06
  • $\begingroup$ @blue I have seen the ideal string being capable of storing elastic potential energy as one of its many properties. $\endgroup$
    – Farcher
    Apr 26 '17 at 6:07
  • $\begingroup$ Yes a string is capable of storing potential energy, but not unless you allow it to be slightly elongated. The question has a major flaw if by in-extensible means it is not possible to elongate it even a bit. $\endgroup$
    – user139621
    Apr 26 '17 at 6:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @blue The ideal massless and inextensible string is also assumed to stored elastic potential energy. This is just the same sort of limiting situation as saying the mass of the string is very much less than any other mass in the system, the extension of the string is very much less than any other relevant distance relating to the system. $\endgroup$
    – Farcher
    Apr 26 '17 at 6:13
  • $\begingroup$ "The ideal massless and inextensible string is also assumed to stored elastic potential energy" Yes, that's basically what I said. We have to make this assumption to make the problem valid. The extension in the string will be negligible compared to the distances moved. However, without knowing that "potential energy" which is stored in the spring we cannot write the energy conservation equation. Obviously, total energy is always conserved, but the point is: We cannot use that here to find the answer to this problem. The correct way to solve this problem is momentum conservation. $\endgroup$
    – user139621
    Apr 26 '17 at 6:16

The two masses are exactly the same. This means that the tension is equal to the weight of either of the two masses. This system is already in equilibrium: the vincular reaction from the ground is zero. Then this equilibrium is somehow altered: B is lifted from height $h$by an amount $\Delta{h}$. If we set the zero potential at ground level, we get: $$ mg(h + \Delta{h}) = \frac{1}{2}m{v_b}^2 + mgh$$ $$ \implies v_b = \sqrt{2g\Delta{h}} $$ At the exact time B gets back where it was it has gained this velocity. A must be lifted upwards. Only gravitational forces apply from now on, so this means total mechanical energy is conserved. Let $h_a, h_b$ be two numbers so that their sum is $h$. These are going to be the two vertical displacements of our masses. The following is true at every instant of time. $$ \frac{1}{2}m{v_b}^2 + mgh = \frac{1}{2}m{v_{af}}^2 + mgh_a + \frac{1}{2}m{v_{bf}}^2 + mgh_b $$ Which simplifies down to: $$ {v_{b}}^2 = {v_{af}}^2 + {v_{bf}}^2 $$ And as you have correctly stated, the velocities must be the same in magnitude. Wrapping it up: $$ 2g\Delta{h} = 2{v_{af}}^2 $$ $$ v_{af} = \sqrt{g\Delta{h}}$$ Oh and of course this means A is going to stop at height $h + \Delta{h}$. But B reaches the ground before A, so it only stops at $h$. You get this result from the third last equation, setting $v_{af}$ and $v_{bf}$ to zero.

You could get this result by sheer force of reason. Think: the masses are equal, and we introduce energy into the system by lifting B. The only thing that could happen is the two masses switching places.

  • $\begingroup$ So what's your point in answering? $\endgroup$ Apr 26 '17 at 7:43
  • $\begingroup$ I'm sorry, apparently my answer was not clear enough. $\endgroup$ Apr 26 '17 at 7:49

Case I gives the correct answer because momentum is being conserved in this solution. Kinetic energy is not necessarily conserved during a collision, but momentum must always be conserved. The constraint $V_A=V_B$ ensures that this collision is inelastic - ie that it will not conserve kinetic energy.

Case II is incorrect because it does not ensure that momentum is conserved : the final momentum is $2\sqrt{g}$ whereas the initial momentum is $\sqrt{2g}$.

Although you have required that kinetic energy is conserved, this is not consistent with both the constraint $V_A=V_B$ and the conservation of momentum. These 3 constraints are mutually incompatible : one of them has to be violated. If you remove the unnecessary constraint $V_A=V_B$ then it is possible to conserve both momentum and kinetic energy. If you remove the constraint that KE is conserved, you get Case I.

@blue and I discussed this problem in the JEE Preparation chatroom. We disagreed over what the solution should be because we were accustomed to using different models for the string. The context in which the question was set (JEE) assumes that strings are totally inelastic (ie COR=0). The given solution confirms that the examiner expected this assumption to be made.

Real strings are to a substantial extent elastic, so a model in which the COR=1 is more realistic, as argued in the articles cited in my answer to Force Transfer Between two bodies linked by a rope. Experiments by Roper and Hartley found COR=0.65.

I agree with Farcher that the elastic model is not incompatible with the string being inextensible, for the reasons given by Farcher. No real string can be massless, but we use this approximation routinely. In the same way, a string can be elastic but so stiff that it is - for all practical purposes - inextensible.


Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.