1
$\begingroup$

I recently studied SRT and came across a strange thing which I don't really understand (it's from a book, but without the example):

Let's consider two charged particles which repell each other such that momentum is conserved. In classical mechanics kinetic energy is not conserved (but the sum of kin. and potential energy).

Now, one could boost to a different reference frame and the principle of relativity then implies momentum conservation again. But, as total momentum transforms as $-\gamma v E$ it follows that E must be also a conserved quantity and therefore the particles masses must decrease accordingly.

I find this really strange since such a time dependent mass would have a huge impact on dynamics. More over, this effect seems to be only occuring when momentum is conserved . So, a particle in an extern field will not change its mass?

The book then makes a few examples where the mass-defect is stated. One of them is a mass which is put to a different height in a homogenous gravity field and therefore loses some of its mass, which seens is also strange to me..

It seems like I have a missunderstanding about some of the concepts in SRT. Maybe, someone knows how to resolve it?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Which book? Which page? $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Apr 23 '17 at 9:07
  • $\begingroup$ W. Nolting Theoretische Physik 4, page 53 but its in german $\endgroup$ – user2224350 Apr 23 '17 at 9:09
  • $\begingroup$ Nolting is not talking about different frames - the energy changes between frames but so does the velocity, the mass does not differ between frames. You need to read the passage you seem to have gathered this from again, he is talking about how mass must change when a process happens in which momentum is conserved but non-relativistic kinetic energy is not. $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Apr 23 '17 at 9:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ACuriousMind But that's what I'm talking about. I didn't say that mass differs in different frames, but that mass changes in order to satisfy energy (momentum) conservation $\endgroup$ – user2224350 Apr 23 '17 at 10:24
  • $\begingroup$ "I find this really strange since such a time dependent mass would have a huge impact on dynamics." What do you mean with time dependent mass? $\endgroup$ – Noiralef Apr 23 '17 at 10:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.