0
$\begingroup$

What i'm struggling with is this question:

Consider a spin S in an external magnetic field along the quantization axis so that the $|S_{z}>$ states are eigenstates with equally spaced eigenvalues E = $-h$$S_{z}$. For this Hamiltonian describe the time evolution of a spin-coherent state and relate it to the classical angular momentum dynamics.

Attempt at a solution:

So i've previously derived that when the time evolution operator $U(t)$ acts on a coherent state i.e. $U(t)|\alpha(0)>$ = $e^{\frac{-iHt}{\hbar}}|\alpha(0)>$ this becomes $U(t)|\alpha(0)>$ = $e^{\frac{-i\omega t}{2}}|\alpha(0)e^{-i\omega t}>$ = $e^{\frac{-i\omega t}{2}}|\alpha(t)>$, which i'm not sure whether will help or not.

I'm guessing here that $\vec{B} = B\vec{z}$, and that possibly the hamiltonian is $H=− μ⃗ · B⃗ = −g q S⃗ · B⃗ = -gqS_{z}B_{z}$ but I don't know where to go from there.

Any help would be amazing, thank you!

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

I will refer to your previous question for some basics but will use a different notation. Let $z=\tan(\theta/2)e^{i\phi}$. The evolution of the spin coherent state \begin{align} \vert z\rangle&:=\frac{1}{(1+\vert z\vert^2)^J} \sum_{M=-J}^J z^{J-M}{{2J}\choose{J+M}}^{1/2}\vert JM\rangle\, , \end{align} should be something like \begin{align} e^{-i\alpha S_zt}\vert z\rangle&= \frac{1}{(1+\vert z\vert^2)^J} \sum_{M=-J}^J z^{J-M}{{2J}\choose{J+M}}^{1/2}e^{-i\alpha M t}\vert JM\rangle\, ,\\ &=e^{-i\alpha J t}\frac{1}{(1+\vert z\vert^2)^J} \sum_{M=-J}^J z^{J-M}{{2J}\choose{J+M}}^{1/2}e^{-i\alpha (M-J) t}\vert JM\rangle\, ,\\ &=e^{-i\alpha J t}\vert e^{i\alpha t}z\rangle\, . \end{align} Please check carefully and make adjustments to your notation but this should give you enough of a hint.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for this! Could you explain what alpha is in your equations? $\endgroup$ Apr 21, 2017 at 21:44
  • $\begingroup$ Your Hamiltonian is something like $H=-gqB_z S_z$ so I guess this makes my $\alpha$ your $-gqB_z$ $\endgroup$ Apr 21, 2017 at 21:50
  • $\begingroup$ Ah great I see. Is there also supposed to be a $1/\hbar$ in the leftmost exponential as well? $\endgroup$ Apr 21, 2017 at 21:56
  • $\begingroup$ Probably yes. You should double check but I think if you take the eigenvalues of $S_z$ to be $\hbar M$ then the $\hbar$s cancel. $\endgroup$ Apr 21, 2017 at 21:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.