2
$\begingroup$

Action of a particle is written as $$S[q]=\int dt\hspace{0.2cm} L(q(t),\dot{q}(t),t).$$ How can I understand why $S$ is a functional of $q$, and not that of $\dot{q}$? Assuming $L=\frac{1}{2}m\dot{q}^2-V(q)$ and $V(q)=\alpha q^2$ (as an example), how can I understand that $S=S[q]$ and $S\neq S[q,\dot{q}]$?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

10
$\begingroup$
  1. The notation $q$ in the functional $S[q]$ stands for the whole parametrized curve/path $q:[t_i,t_f]\to \mathbb{R}$, not just a single position. In particular, the parametrized path already carries all the information about the derivative $\dot{q}\equiv\frac{dq}{dt}$, so there is no need to include it as an extra argument in the action.

  2. In contrast, the Lagrangian $L(q(t),v(t),t)$ at some time $t$ is a function of

    • the instantaneous position $q(t)$ at the time $t$;

    • the instantaneous velocity $v(t)$ at the time $t$; and

    • the time $t$ (also known as explicit time-dependence).

  3. See also this and this related Phys.SE posts.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ But the Lagrangian is also parameterized by $q(t)$, the whole path. Isn't it? But we still write $L=L(q,\dot{q})$. @Qmechanic $\endgroup$
    – SRS
    Commented Jan 8, 2018 at 17:47
  • $\begingroup$ This is explained in my Phys.SE answer here. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Jan 8, 2018 at 20:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.