1
$\begingroup$

Approaching the following question

Imagine we have a collection of $N = 100$ simple harmonic oscillators. The total internal energy is $U = q \epsilon$ where $q$ is the number of energy quanta. Assume $q >> N >> 1$. If we double the internal energy, by how much will the entropy of the collection change?

The question was originally found here under Question 5.

The answer is $\sigma_{final} - \sigma_{initial} = 69.3$

How is this determined?

I know $S = k_b ln \Omega$, where $S$ is entropy, $\Omega$ is the number of micro-states, $\sigma = \frac{ 1}{ \Omega}$, $k_b$ is the Boltzmann constant.

I know $<energy> = 1/2 k T$ per quadradic term.

I know $\frac{ 1}{ T} \equiv \frac{ \partial S}{\partial U}$

But how does doubling energy effect entropy? Specifically, what equation am I looking for to determine this?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

You have $$U=N\langle E \rangle=N\ (\langle E_\text{kin} \rangle+\langle E_\text{pot} \rangle)=N k\ T,$$ $$\tfrac{\partial S(U)}{\partial U}=\tfrac{1}{k\ T}=\tfrac{N}{U}\ \ \Longrightarrow\ \ S(U)=N \ln(U)+S_0,$$ $$\Delta S=S(x\ U)-S(U)=N\ln(x\ U)-N\ln(U)=N \ln(x).$$ And $$100 \ln(2)=69.315...$$

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean by the "the way you rewrite the question, we have to look up the source anyway."? $\endgroup$ – rudolph9 Jul 22 '12 at 22:03
  • $\begingroup$ @rudolph9: The thread you posted an hour ago doesn't contain the question "What is the temperature?" but only the phrase "Why is the answer $T= \dots\ $ ?" and here the $\sigma$ is mentioned but not involved in the formulation of the question. $\endgroup$ – Nikolaj-K Jul 22 '12 at 22:05
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, I have a bad tendency to see what I wanted to write rather than what I actually wrote (I went ahead and updated the other question) and I am not particularly framilar with conventions for greek letters in physics. Please leme know if other changes are needed. $\endgroup$ – rudolph9 Jul 22 '12 at 22:10
  • $\begingroup$ Also on the note of the $sigma$, the answer was given as $\sigma_{final} - \sigma_{initial} = 69.3$ $\endgroup$ – rudolph9 Jul 22 '12 at 22:12
  • $\begingroup$ Your answer definitely make way more sense! $\endgroup$ – rudolph9 Jul 22 '12 at 22:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.