In the theory of angular momentum, we wish to study the projective representations of the rotation group $\text{SO}(3)$, for which we turn to the representation theory of the double cover $\text{SU}(2)$. I understand the finite dimensional representation theory of the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{su}(2)$ where we find either integer or half integer weights depending on the dimension of the representation. However I have not been able to find a satisfying treatment of the infinite dimensional case. Let $\mathcal{H} = L^2(\mathbb{R^3})$. It is well known that the eigenvalues of the angular momentum operators on this Hilbert space will be integer multiples of $\hbar$, not half integers. How can we see this using representation theory?

Edit: I found an answer with the help of the commenters (thank you!). $L^2(\mathbb{R}^3)$ decomposes as an orthogonal direct sum of vector spaces $V_l$, each of which is invariant under the action of the rotation group and thus irreducible under this action. Furthermore, one can show that each of these vector spaces $V_l$ has dimension $2l+1$, where $l$ is an integer. Thus, each of these spaces is odd. Hence, the projective representation of $\text{SO}(3)$ on each $V_l$ will have integer eigenvalues. See Hall - Quantum Theory for Mathematicians for the proof.

  • $\begingroup$ $SO(3)$ is compact so all unitary representations are equivalent to finite dimensional ones... or are you thinking of some limit of large representation or non-unitary irreps? $\endgroup$ – ZeroTheHero Apr 11 '17 at 19:44
  • $\begingroup$ @ZeroTheHero What do you mean all unitary representations are equivalent to finite dimensional ones? If the Hilbert space I want to represent $\text{SU}(2)$ on is infinite-dimensional, how can I realize this as a finite dimensional rep.? $\endgroup$ – Jackson Burzynski Apr 11 '17 at 19:49
  • $\begingroup$ Decompose the Hilbert space in finite dimensional irreps. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… $\endgroup$ – ZeroTheHero Apr 11 '17 at 19:56
  • $\begingroup$ @ZeroTheHero this doesn't explain why we only see integer eigenvalues. It appears that in the infinite dimensional case we are only looking at ordinary representations of $\text{SO}(3)$ rather than projective ones, but I do not understand why. $\endgroup$ – Jackson Burzynski Apr 11 '17 at 20:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No. The Hilbert space is highly reducible, and decomposes into a direct sum of finite-dimensional (in some cases very large) representations. @ValterMoretti just answered as I was writing my comment. $\endgroup$ – ZeroTheHero Apr 11 '17 at 20:27

Since $SO(3)$ is compact, in view of Peter-Weyl's theorem, every unitary strongly continuous representation of $SO(3)$ in a Hilbert space is a direct sum (not a direct integral) of finite-dimensional irreducible representations which, in turn, are finite dimensional representations of $SU(2)$. So, once you know all finite dimensional of $SU(2)$ representations you know everything.

  • $\begingroup$ You just beat me to it.. $\endgroup$ – ZeroTheHero Apr 11 '17 at 20:26
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry...It happens :) $\endgroup$ – Valter Moretti Apr 11 '17 at 20:27
  • $\begingroup$ Not a big deal. Stay well! $\endgroup$ – ZeroTheHero Apr 11 '17 at 20:27
  • $\begingroup$ @ValterMoretti I understand this but it still doesn't explain why we only see integer values eigenvalues when representing $\text{SU}(2)$ on $L^2(\mathbb{R}^3)$. However, I have just found an explanation as to why this is that I will post as an update. $\endgroup$ – Jackson Burzynski Apr 11 '17 at 20:29
  • $\begingroup$ @JacksonBurzynski please do so! $\endgroup$ – ZeroTheHero Apr 11 '17 at 20:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.