3
$\begingroup$

This question already has an answer here:

My physics textbook says two electric field lines never intersect. Their explanation runs somewhat like this:

If two field lines crossed, there would be two different directions to the electric field at the intersection point, which is impossible by definition.

A similar explanation is provided as to why two stream lines never cross.

However, mathematically, two intersecting curves can have the same direction of tangent at their intersection point. For example, consider the $x-$axis and the curve $y=x^3$ is the $xy$ plane. Or any two curves of the form $y=x^{2k+1}$ with $k\in\mathbb N$, plotted for $-1<x<1$.

Is the explanation then wrong, considering these counterexamples? If not, why not? If yes, then what's the correct explanation?

Edit: The answers to this Phys.SE question seem to focus on the very explanation I am having trouble understanding; I don't see how this is a duplicate of that one. I'd rather describe this as a follow-up question to that one.

$\endgroup$

marked as duplicate by anna v, Yashas, Qmechanic Apr 3 '17 at 6:26

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Possible duplicate of Why can two (or more) electric field lines never cross? $\endgroup$ – anna v Apr 3 '17 at 5:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If you draw what you are describing, you are drawing a source at x=0 . Sources are charges in experimental observations and as modeled by classical electrodynamics. electric field lines theoreticlly cross on the point where a point charge is. $\endgroup$ – anna v Apr 3 '17 at 5:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is really a mathematical question, related to the existence and uniqueness theorem for ODEs. The answer depends on how pathological you allow your situations to be. $\endgroup$ – knzhou Apr 3 '17 at 5:25
  • $\begingroup$ In a real physical setup, this wouldn't be allowed. By allowing field lines to merge into one, you increase the local electric flux density to infinity. $\endgroup$ – knzhou Apr 3 '17 at 5:26
  • $\begingroup$ @knzhou I'm interested to know how the existence and uniqueness theorem for ODEs solves my problem; mind elaborating? And FWIW, I don't mind pathological situations. :) $\endgroup$ – Ankoganit Apr 3 '17 at 6:09
2
$\begingroup$

Electric field lines are a visual construct to understand electric fields. By definition, the density of field lines indicates the magnitude of electric field at a point and the direction of the field lines indicate the direction of the electric field.

If two field lines intersect, then what would be the direction at the point of intersection? Therefore, electric field lines cannot intersect.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Then why don't we find the net of the two intersecting lines to get the E. Field .? $\endgroup$ – Mitchell Apr 3 '17 at 5:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If you had two electric field lines due to two sources at a point, their vector sum would indeed give you the direction of the electric field (and the density would give the magnitude). However, the field line at a location in space by definition accounts for the individual sources. The field line at a location represents the direction of force on a positive charge. $\endgroup$ – Yashas Apr 3 '17 at 5:53
  • $\begingroup$ "If two field lines intersect, then what would be the direction at the point of intersection?" Sorry, I don't see how this is a problem. :( As I mentioned in the question, the direction can be well-defined in cases of some intersections. Thanks for your interest. $\endgroup$ – Ankoganit Apr 3 '17 at 6:12
  • $\begingroup$ There can be only one field line for a point in space. The field line gives the direction of electric field. You cannot have electric field which has two directions. $\endgroup$ – Yashas Apr 3 '17 at 6:16
  • $\begingroup$ I agree that we can't have electric field with two directions; but why not two field lines with one direction? $\endgroup$ – Ankoganit Apr 3 '17 at 6:28

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.