8
$\begingroup$

In the literature one often finds covariant relativistic generalizations of classical non equilibrium statistical equations (Boltzmann, Vlasov, Landau, Fokker-Planck, etc...) but I wonder what is the meaning of the time which is used. As far as I know, one can only write the interaction between two relativistic charged particles by doing the computation in the proper space-time frame of one of the particles. With three relativistic charged particles I am already wondering about how to tackle the problem of proper time, so for N close to a mole...I am lost. Since non-equilibrium statistical mechanics is derived from Hamiltonian mechanics, I can reformulate my question as follows. What is the Hamiltonian of N relativistic interacting charged particles ?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ icmp.lviv.ua/journal/zbirnyk.25/001/art01.pdf "Classical relativistic system of N charges. Hamiltonian description, forms of dynamics, and partition function" looks as if it answers exactly your question. $\endgroup$ – John Rennie Jul 18 '12 at 12:08
  • $\begingroup$ @JohnRennie perhaps you could post that as an answer? (with a brief statement of what the article actually says that answers the question) $\endgroup$ – David Z Jul 19 '12 at 6:40
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DavidZaslavsky a quick glance at the article convinced me that a brief description would be hard! The fact I found it is more a testament to my Google skills than my deep knowledge of relativistic statistical thermodynamics :-) $\endgroup$ – John Rennie Jul 19 '12 at 6:55
  • $\begingroup$ The paper is quite complex, so far my researches to solve the problem has only brought back this paper: cft.edu.pl/~laturski/Physica/… I am not sure I understand how they have avoided the retarded time for each particle ... $\endgroup$ – Shaktyai Jul 20 '12 at 11:18
2
$\begingroup$

Relativistic non-equilibrium statistical physics is done in a field theoretic setting, not in a multiparticle setting. There everything is naturally covariant in space-time coordinates, and the question of proper time does not arise. (Instead one has the preferred time of a coordinate systen comoving with the fluid.)

Note that there is no consistent classical relativistic multiparticle setting; see Currie, Jordan and Sudarshan, Reviews of Modern Physics 35 (1963), 350. Relativistic quantum multiparticle theory is possible in a pure particle framework; see, e.g.,

B.D. Keister and W.N. Polyzou, Relativistic Hamiltonian Dynamics in Nuclear and Particle Physics, in: Advances in Nuclear Physics, Volume 20, (J. W. Negele and E.W. Vogt, eds.) Plenum Press 1991.

But it is somewhat awkward to use and I haven't seen any statistical mechanics based on it. The conventional approach to relativistic quantum multiparticle theory is through quantum field theory. For a treatment of relativistic statistical mechanics in these terms see, e.g., the book Calzetta,& Hu, Nonequilibrium quantum field theory. Cambridge University Press (2008).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.