1
$\begingroup$

Lets assume the classic quantum harmonic oscillator (HO) with a Hamiltonian $$ \hat{H}(t) = - \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{d^2}{d x^2} + \frac{m \omega^2 \hat{x}^2}{2} + F(t) \hat{x} $$ where $F(t)$ is a time-dependent force defined via $$ F(t)=\frac{F_0 \tau / \omega}{\tau^2 + t^2} $$ At time $t \to -\infty$ the particle with mass $m$ is in the ground state $| 0 \rangle$ of the HO potential. Since this is a time-dependent problem, I try to use time-dependent perturbation theory to first order to obtain the probability that at $t \to \infty$ the particle is in the first excited state $|1\rangle$. From the lecture we have obtained the (slightly more general) formula $$ |c_f (t)|^2 = \frac{1}{\hbar^2} \left| \int_{t_0}^t V_{fi} (t') e^{i \omega_{fi} t'} dt' \right|^2 $$ which we already have applied to the kicked oscillator as shown here (I used the same notation to make life easier for the readers here). But, how can I (can I?) apply this approach to this problem? As I see it, I need to somehow use $F(t)$ to get an expression for $V_{fi}(t')$ that gives me a calculable expression.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Just do the integral. Is the problem that you don't know how to do the integral? $\endgroup$ – DanielSank Mar 30 '17 at 16:15
  • $\begingroup$ Is your problem that you don't know how to relate $V$ and $F$? If that's your question, back up and review where that integral formula came from. $\endgroup$ – DanielSank Mar 30 '17 at 16:17
  • $\begingroup$ Also, there's an error in the question. The drive term in $H$ should be $-F \hat{x}$. $\endgroup$ – DanielSank Mar 30 '17 at 16:20
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not really sure how to relate $V$ and $F$. You're right, the $\hat{x}$ was missing on the problem sheet, which threw me off. I'll fix the Hamiltonian accordingly. $\endgroup$ – John W. Mar 30 '17 at 16:22
1
$\begingroup$

Your hamiltonian looks pretty wonky, and the notation should give itself away. $F(t)$ is a force, so what is it doing inside the hamiltonian without an $x$?

Instead, you might want to consider the hamiltonian $$ H(t) = - \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{d^2}{d x^2} + \frac{1}{2}m \omega^2 x^2 + F(t)x, $$ where $V(t) = F(t)x$ is a bona fide potential. This will save you from some embarrassing features of your original hamiltonian, like the fact that if you just set $V(t) = F(t)$ then its matrix elements will just be $$ V_{fi}(t) = \langle f|V(t)|i\rangle = \langle f|F(t)|i\rangle = F(t)\langle f|i\rangle = \delta_{fi}F(t), $$ and you will not get any transitions at all. If, instead, you use the actual potential $V(t)=F(t)x$, the matrix elements are $$ V_{fi}(t) = \langle f|V(t)|i\rangle = \langle f|F(t)x|i\rangle = F(t)\langle f|x|i\rangle, $$ and they can be calculated relatively easily by expressing $x$ as a sum of $a$ and $a^\dagger$, giving you an expression proportional to $\delta_{f,i-1}+\delta_{f,i+1}$. In the end, this will reduce rather easily to some prefactor multiplying the integral $$ \int_{-\infty}^\infty F(t) e^{i\omega t}\mathrm dt, $$ which requires some handling of the exponential integral Ei function (see also here) (probably after some partial-fractions handling of the denominator? e.g. you can split $$\frac{2}{\tau^2+t^2}=\frac{1}{t+i\tau}+\frac{1}{t-i\tau}$$ or something) but which should not be particularly challenging.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ As per Daniel Sanks comment, I have fixed the Hamiltonian (the x operator was missing on the problem sheet). So now I have my potential, just gotta crack that integral. $\endgroup$ – John W. Mar 30 '17 at 16:25
  • $\begingroup$ I set $\hat{x}=\sqrt{\hbar/2m \omega} (a + a^\dagger)$, which does yield the two expressions $\delta_{1,1}=1$ and $0$ (from applying $\hat{a}$ to $|0\rangle$. So the root $\sqrt{\hbar/2m \omega}$ is the prefactor mentioned by you? $\endgroup$ – John W. Mar 30 '17 at 16:41
  • $\begingroup$ @JohnW. Yes, precisely. $\endgroup$ – Emilio Pisanty Mar 30 '17 at 16:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm reasonably sure you can do that integral exactly using contour integration. $\endgroup$ – DanielSank Mar 30 '17 at 16:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.