3
$\begingroup$

I just heard a physicist say

"[an] exciting discovery would be to find gravitational waves from the beginning of time."

Since gravity travels at the speed of light, wouldn't gravitational waves emanating from the limits of the visible universe be the oldest discovered; or the age of the CMB?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

The photons from the CMB were emitted when the universe was a few hundred-thousand years old. That was the amount of time it took for the universe to become transparent: at earlier times, the density of stuff (plasma) was too high, and photons were absorbed and scattered around instead of "free-streaming" out, and eventually to us.

Gravitational-Waves (GW) don't have the same obstacle. In particular, because the coupling between GW and matter is so weak, the universe becomes transparent to them incredibly quickly. I think the particular time they decouple is model-dependent, but suffices to say when the universe is (far) less than a second old. This is why people are excited about primordial GW observations1 --- for their window into the earliest stages of the universe from which we'll never see light.


1: There is a stochastic Gravitational Wave Background (GWB) which usually refers to the background of gravitational waves from unresolved astrophysical sources (like binaries) all added up. The Cosmic Gravitational Wave Background is different, and what we're talking about there.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.