0
$\begingroup$

Starting with the commonly cited Forchheimer equation:

$$\tag{1} -\frac{dp}{ds}=\frac{\mu q}{kA}+\frac{\beta \rho q^2}{A^2}$$

multiplying through by density

$$\tag{2} -\rho \frac{dp}{ds}=\frac{\mu \rho q}{kA}+\frac{\beta \rho^2 q^2}{A^2}$$

noting that $\rho q = \dot m$

Dividing (2) through by viscosity:

$$\tag{3} -\frac{\rho}{\mu} \frac{dp}{ds}=\frac{\dot m}{kA}+\frac{\beta \dot m^2}{\mu A^2}$$

Here I see I cannot completely separate the pressure dependent variables ($\rho$ and $\mu$) as I have a viscosity term on the far right-hand side of (3).

Multiplying through by the differential $ds$ and then including the integration notation:

$$\tag{4} -\int_{p_b}^p \frac{\rho}{\mu} dp=\frac{\dot m}{kA}\int_0^L ds+\frac{\beta \dot m^2}{A^2} \int_0^L \frac{1}{\mu} ds$$

So here is my question: $\mu$ is a function of pressure and pressure varies as a function of length (or distance). Is it possible to solve for the integral on the far right-hand side of (4) noting the aforementioned fact? I would also like to know what this type of problem in called in mathematics, if there is such a term for this type of problem.

Pressure as a function of length (or distance) may be written as:

$$\tag{5} p_p (p_s)=p_p(p_0)+\frac{\dot m \mu}{kA}s$$

where

$$\tag{6} p_p(p)=\frac{\mu_i z_i}{p_i}\int_{p_b}^p \frac{p}{\mu z} dp$$

where $\mu_i$, $z_i$, and $p_i$ are the normalizing viscosity, real-gas z-factor, and pressure values, respectively, which are constants, selected as the values at the inlet of the porous medium where $s=0$.

Is it possible to invoke (5) into the $\int_0^L \frac{1}{\mu} ds$ term of (4) and perform the integration?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Eqn. 3 is variable separable and can be rearranged to $$\frac{dp}{f(p)}=ds$$ The left side of the equation has to be integrated numerically.

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks Chester, I understand how to perform the numerical integration of the $-\frac{\rho}{\mu} dp$ term on the LHS of (3). But how do I handle the viscosity term on the far RHS of (3)? Is there a way I can get that viscosity term to the LHS so that I have an equation as you describe ($\frac{dp}{f(p)}=ds$)? $\endgroup$
    – Armadillo
    Commented Mar 21, 2017 at 14:54
  • $\begingroup$ $\frac{1}{f(p)}=-\left[\frac{\mu \dot m}{\rho kA}+\frac{\beta \dot m^2}{\rho A^2}\right]$ $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 21, 2017 at 16:12
  • $\begingroup$ so, starting from (3), multiply through by $-\frac{\mu}{\rho}$ to obtain $\frac{dp}{ds}=-\left[\frac{\mu \dot m}{\rho kA}+\frac{\beta \dot m^2}{\rho A^2}\right]$, then rearrange further? I think I am not following, as where I'm at now, I have all the variables as a function of pressure on the RHS, which would then need to be integrated as a function of distance. My apologies for not following, I will give more time and thought to let it sink in. $\endgroup$
    – Armadillo
    Commented Mar 21, 2017 at 17:04
  • $\begingroup$ Suppose you have f(x)dx=kdy. Could you integrate the left side? Could you integrate the right side? The solution is $\int{f(x)dx}=ky + C$ where C is the constant of integration. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 21, 2017 at 20:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $$\frac{\rho dp}{\left[\frac{\mu}{k }+\frac{\beta \dot{m}}{ A}\right]}=-\frac{\dot{m}ds}{A}$$ $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 22, 2017 at 3:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.