0
$\begingroup$

I want to calculate the energy-momentum tensor from the Chern-Simons Lagrangian in index notation. I know the Chern-Simons Lagrangian does not depend on the metric because it can be written in the coordinate-free form $\mathcal{L} = A\wedge dA$ as is e.g. also explained in this post. However, I want to see the same result when I work explicitly in index notation. $$ S = \sqrt{-g}\int dx^3 \left( \frac{\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}}{\sqrt{-g}} A_\mu\partial_\nu A_\rho - J^\mu A_\mu \right) $$

Edit When I posted this question I made a stupid mistake, I forgot to include a factor of $\frac{1}{\sqrt{g}}$ in the definition of the Levi-Cevita tensor $\frac{\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}}{\sqrt{g}}$. This factor will cancel the $\sqrt{g}$ in the measure of the integral and will obviously make the Chern-Simons term independent of the metric. Written this way, the Lagrangian does obviously does not depend on the metric as the factors of $\sqrt{-g}$ will cancel everywhere.

Using that the energy-momentum tensor is given by the variation of the Lagrangian with respect to the metric, it follows that the energy-momentum tensor will vanish if the Lagrangian doesn't depend on the metric. $$ T^{\mu\nu} = \frac{2}{\sqrt{-g}} \frac{\delta \mathcal{L}}{\delta g^{\mu\nu}} $$

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Lol, why is the determinant of the metric not under the integral?

The correct action is $S=\int \left( \mathrm{d}^3 x \sqrt{-g}\right) \left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{-g}} \epsilon^{ijk}\right) A_i \partial_j A_k$, where $\epsilon^{ijk}$ is a tensor density, not a tensor. So we see that the metric dependence cancels.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JgL There are no object as $\partial^a \phi$, $D^a \phi$ or $A^a$. They are meaningful only if the indices are lowered. So one has to do it before taking derivatives with respect to the metric. $\endgroup$ – Andrey Feldman Mar 18 '17 at 2:10
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, so doesn't that mean I have to do the same for $\epsilon^{ijk}$? This is the point that is confusing me. $\endgroup$ – JgL Mar 18 '17 at 23:20
  • $\begingroup$ @JgL No. The easiest way to see it, is to rewrite all the stuff in the form notation, in which it is obvious. Here $\epsilon^{ijk}$ is not a tensor, but a tensor density with components $\pm 1$, it has the same value as $\epsilon_{ijk}$. $\endgroup$ – Andrey Feldman Mar 19 '17 at 1:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.