2
$\begingroup$

I went again through some of my undergraduate books of quantum mechanics to get a new look at it as a futur PhD (not in QM though). I got answers for some old questions that bugged me at the time but their is one I can't figure out. I left it years ago and coming back to it I still can't get the point of the exercice.

It is from the book "Quantum mechanics in simple matrix form" by Thomas F. Jordan. I liked it a lot because the author starts from scratch concerning imaginary numbers and matrix algebra.

However, in the seventh chapter, their is only one exercise and I don't see the point. The other exercices in the previous chapter were straight forward computing to get a first hand on algebra and were quite useful for me as a student. But in chapter 7 (no mention of quantum mechanics has been done so far except Heisenberg inequality, which is the guideline of the book), the exercice reads as follows:

Two quantities are represented by the matrices: $$M=\left[\begin{array}{l}3&0&-i\\0&1&0\\i&0&3\end{array}\right]\ N=\left[\begin{array}{l}3&0&2i\\0&7&0\\-2i&0&3\end{array}\right]$$ The possible values of the quantity $M$ are $1,2$ ans $4$. What are the possible values of the quantity represented by N?

The author never mentionned the link between probabilities of a given value and its matrix representation so I'm a bit confused. I don't understand how the exercice is supposed to be solvable and what is the expected solution. What is the point of this exercice? I'm sure I miss something but I can't tell what.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ @JohnForkosh Thank you. I'll dig it if I can find it. I'm actually revisiting my old textbooks to, as I mentionned, check old questions I couldn't answer at the time. Jordan's book is quite good but the beginning is really intented to laymen with absolutely no clue about complex numbers and matrix algebra. Yet I try to answer the questions only with what has been mentionned so far and it is sometime quite tricky. $\endgroup$ – G.Clavier Mar 15 '17 at 8:40
0
$\begingroup$

The possible values are the eigenvalues. There is no link between a matrix and probabilities: the probabilities depend on the modulus squared of overlap between the quantum state $\vert \psi\rangle$ under investigation and the eigenvectors. As stated the question is fine as it only asks for possible outcomes.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ That was my initial guess. But the author never mentioned any diagonalisation method so I tried to make a guess using only what as been described in the book so far (basic matrix algebra and probabilities). So I was wondering is their was any way to make a guess about eigenvalues using only squared matrices or matrix product. It seems not from what you're saying. $\endgroup$ – G.Clavier Mar 14 '17 at 19:57
  • $\begingroup$ @G.Clavier actually your matrices are equivalent to block diagonal matrices so by inspection $1$ and $7$ are eigenvalues of the first and second matrices, respectively. Otherwise you have to slug it out. $\endgroup$ – ZeroTheHero Mar 14 '17 at 20:11
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You can avoid the slugging by noting that N = -2M + 9I, so the eigenvalues of N are −2∗(eigenvalues of M)+9, or {7,5,1}. $\endgroup$ – Paul G Mar 17 '17 at 17:17
  • $\begingroup$ @PaulG This is exactly the link I was missing, thanks! $\endgroup$ – G.Clavier Apr 5 '17 at 14:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.