2
$\begingroup$

I am wondering about the order of terms from equation 34 this pdf by Hitoshi Murayama on second quantization. Specifically, why they are able to pull the H past the $\Psi(\vec x)$. i.e.

$$ H|\psi(t)\rangle= \int dx\,H \Psi(\vec x,t)\phi^\dagger(\vec x)|0\rangle $$

makes sense, but how are they allowed to pull H in front of $\Psi(\vec x,t)$: $$ \int dx\,H \Psi(\vec x,t)\phi^\dagger(\vec x)|0\rangle= \int dx\,\Psi(\vec x,t)H\phi^\dagger(\vec x)|0\rangle $$

However, here we have $|\Psi(t)\rangle$ already in the x basis, so I would posit it is because H is an operator and we can move $\Psi(\vec x,t)$ around. Yet, I find issue in this, because H frequently involves derivatives, since for a free particle it is $\frac{P^2}{2m}$, which involves a derivative in the x basis.

As a side note to help understand my question: For example, when inserting a complete set of states into an inner product, the order of operators, bras and kets are never changed, until we project the kets into a basis (i.e. the x basis):

$$\langle\psi|\hat A|\phi\rangle= \langle\psi|\mathbb I \, \hat A |\phi\rangle= \langle\psi|\Bigg(\int |x\rangle\langle x| \, dx\Bigg)\hat A |\phi\rangle= \int\langle\psi|x\rangle\langle x|\hat A |\phi\rangle \, dx= \int\psi(x)\phi_A(x)\, dx= \int\phi_A(x)\psi(x)\, dx $$

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

You are allowed to swap the positions, because $\Psi(x,t)$ is just a number, a coefficient that you expand the state $\Psi(t)$ into.

If I expand the equation you begin with, you have:

$ | \Psi(t) \rangle = \int dx \Psi(x,t) |x \rangle $

Here $\Psi(x,t)$ is just a number, and $ |x \rangle = \Phi^\dagger |0> $ are the states that your state $|\Psi(t)>$ is expanded in. You can switch the positions of $\Psi(x,t)$ and $H$, because $H$ is a linear operator.

You are right, when you choose a representation (for example, the position representation), then the operator $H$ contains derivatives that depend on the position. But you never choose a representation here, so everything is fine.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, can you explain why? With $\Psi(x,t) = \langle x | \Psi \rangle $ everything is fine, I'd say. $\endgroup$ Nov 24, 2017 at 0:06
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry about the confusion. I mean the c number function in the lastline of the original post $\endgroup$ Nov 24, 2017 at 7:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.