6
$\begingroup$

enter image description here
Image source

I have never done the experiment so as far as I understand, if the mirrors $M1$ and $M2$ are perpendicular to each other the observer at $O$ will see a circular fringe pattern. If additionally $M1$ and $M2$ are equidistant from the beam-splitter $P1$ ($\Delta d = 0$), then the observer does not see any ring (just a single dark fringe).

Question 1: Where does the observer see the fringes? On the beam-splitter $P1$ or what is the "screen"?

Question 2 Assume we start at the point where $\Delta d = 0$. There is just a single dark fringe (taking up the entire "screen").As we move one of the mirrors by $\frac{\lambda}{4}$ A light circle fringe should appear inside the pattern shifting the dark one outside. How thick is it? Are they both of equal thickness and taking up together the entire screen? Then we shift again by $\frac{\lambda}{4}$ a dark circle comes from the inside, now we have 3 circles. Again are they of equal thickness? As we shift more and new circles appear from the inside at what point do the outside rings start to disappear? Or do they not disappear and the rings just get pushed closer together?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Additional question: Which form has the spot for the observer if remove mirror M1 or mirror M2? $\endgroup$ – HolgerFiedler Mar 7 '17 at 19:17
8
$\begingroup$

Here is a schematic diagram to show how the circular fringes are formed using the Michelson interferometer.
These fringes are sometimes called fringes of equal inclination or Haidinger fringes.

enter image description here

The light comes from an extended source and is reflected off two "parallel" mirrors $M_1$ and $M_2$ as shown in figure 1 of your source.

The light from point source $Y$ after reflection from the mirrors forms virtual images $Y_1$ and $Y_2$ of the point object.
These two virtual images act as coherent sources and so the light reflected from the mirrors can produces a visible interference pattern.

As you can see from the diagram you will observe parallel rays so your eye (or a lens) will be focussed at infinity.
Because the aperture of the eye is relatively small you will not see many fringes unless you move your eye.

The is another point on the extended source $X$ which will also produce interference at an angle $\theta$ and indeed there are a whole number of such sources which are equidistant from the axis of symmetry $AB$.
This results in the fringes being circular.

When the two mirrors are coincident you will not see a uniform blackness due to imperfections in the mirrors.
As you move one mirror away from the outer relatively broad fringes will collapse into the centre but more will fringes will appear from the sides and those will be sharper.


One tip when aligning the interferometer is to stick a pin which is illuminated from the side of interferometer on the diffuser ? ground glass plate.
Then look through the interferometer and you will see the images of two pins.
Adjust the separation of the mirrors and their orientation until there is a position of no parallax (no relative movement between the images when the eye is moved) for the two images.
Using a source (or a while light source) should enable you to make the final adjustments to observe the zero order fringe.


Update as a result of a comment

Schematic diagrams greatly exaggerated.

enter image description here

When the mirrors are inclined to one another and the apex of the wedge is in the field of view you will get fringes of equal thickness (wedge fringes) which are localised in the region of the wedge.
So this time you will need to focus in the region of the wedge.
The are the type of fringes which are called Newton's rings and you will recall you have to focus a microscope in the region of the air gap between the lens and the optical flat to observe them.

In general the apex will not be in the field of view and so you will get a "mixture" as shown for the green fringes.
The difference between the two arrangements is that the inclination of one mirror relative to the other has been reversed.
This is what you will normally see before adjusting the mirrors to get circular fringes.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I 've been playing around with the diagram you've posted a bit, and I came to a conclusion that the mathematical reason why if $d=0$ there is just a single dark fringe visible, is that we have the destructive interference condition $2d \cos \theta = m\lambda$ and if $d=0$ this is only true for a single possible $m = 0$. The constructive interference condition$2d \cos \theta = (m- 1/2)\lambda$ cannot hold for any $m$. Does this make sense? $\endgroup$ – pseudomarvin Mar 7 '17 at 23:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @pseudomarvin I am sorry but I forgot to comment on the reason for the $\pi$ phase shift when the mirrors are coincident. You cannot get it from my diagram as it does not have the beam splitter in it. If you look at your first diagram the light which reaches $C$ has suffered a glass to air reflection ($0$ phase change) at the beam splitter whereas the light from $B$ suffered an air to glass reflection ($\pi$ phase change) at the beam splitter on its way to the observer. $\endgroup$ – Farcher Mar 8 '17 at 6:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @pseudomarvin Here is a simulation which might be of use regarding what the fringes look like. demonstrations.wolfram.com/… $\endgroup$ – Farcher Mar 8 '17 at 6:52
  • $\begingroup$ @Farcher Could you please confirm whether I am right or not at this point. The parallel rays be it in this question or like the ones from a thin film interfere because they are brought to a single focus by our eye or the lens and at that focus (retina) they interfere . Is that right ? If it's right then if a film is not perfectly parallel or due to a reason the rays are not parallel they they will not converge to single point or we will see diverging rays . In that case will not not see the interference pattern . Right ? $\endgroup$ – Shashaank Mar 9 '17 at 17:58
  • $\begingroup$ @Shashaank I have added an update to my answer. $\endgroup$ – Farcher Mar 9 '17 at 20:58
1
$\begingroup$

Ans1. you can put screen (as you want) anywhere from P1 to Down-side (towards "O"). & the only thing that changes as screen distance is the corresponding Radius of the Rings.(bigger or smaller pattern correspondingly)

Ans2. when you move M1 from "0" to "lemda/4" to "lemda/2"..etc new fringes will appears and these fringes will be of decreasing thickness (with the central will be thickest).. see the link below.... thanks
https://www.google.co.in/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fphys.libretexts.org%2F%40api%2Fdeki%2Ffiles%2F5970%2FCNX_UPhysics_36_05_Fringe.jpg%3Fsize%3Dbestfit%26width%3D488%26height%3D345%26revision%3D1&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fphys.libretexts.org%2FTextMaps%2FGeneral_Physics_Textmaps%2FMap%253A_University_Physics_(OpenStax)%2FMap%253A_University_Physics_III_(OpenStax)%2F3%253A_Interference%2F3.5%253A_The_Michelson_Interferometer&docid=gWd0gF8gzxVk0M&tbnid=t3RvDVX9m5UXEM%3A&vet=1&w=488&h=345&bih=944&biw=1680&q=michelson%20interference&ved=0ahUKEwiu0fqyhMXSAhUIr48KHaKHAm4QMwg6KBUwFQ&iact=mrc&uact=8

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Your first statement is not completely accurate. M1 and M2 do need to be equal distance or (equal full wavelengths) from the beam splitter in order to get interference and create the rings but the final distance to the screen will also determine if the center is solid (dark) or light. It will change every 1/2 wavelength from the screen. Q1-The two recombined rays are projected onto a screen. You do not want to look directly into the on coming rays. Q2-The thickness of the rings get smaller as you move away from the center. The number of rings doesn't change but the number that you see depends on the distance, how its focused and the overall lighting or intensity.You can focus on a few in the center or hundreds with each one getting thinner and thinner as you move out. enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your answer but are you sure about the first two sentences? In every book I've seen one of the mirrors is movable and this would not make much sense if the mirrors not being equidistant from the beam splitter caused the interference to disappear. See for example hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/michel.html $\endgroup$ – pseudomarvin Mar 7 '17 at 22:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.