4
$\begingroup$

I read on Wikipedia that the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution is given by:

$$f(v) = \sqrt{\left(\frac{m}{2 \pi kT}\right)^3}\, 4\pi v^2 e^{- \frac{mv^2}{2kT}}....(1)$$

In Wikipedia's words: "This probability density function gives the probability, per unit speed, of finding the particle with a speed near $v$". Now later on, they define the "distribution for velocity vector" as:

$$f_\mathbf{v} (v_x, v_y, v_z) = \left(\frac{m}{2 \pi kT} \right)^{3/2}\exp \left[-\frac{m(v_x^2 + v_y^2 +v_z^2)}{2kT}\right]....(2)$$ and this gives "The probability of finding a particle with velocity in the infinitesimal element $[dv_x, dv_y, dv_z]$ about velocity $v = [v_x, v_y, v_z]$." which, for one dimension reduces to: $$f_v (v) =\sqrt{\frac{m}{2 \pi kT}}\exp \left[\frac{-mv^2}{2kT}\right].$$ but since the speed just equal to the absolute value of the velocity in one dimension, after making the appropriate change of variables $u=|v|$ in $(1)$, we get: $$f_u (u) =\sqrt{\frac{2m}{ \pi kT}}\exp \left[\frac{-mu^2}{2kT}\right]....(3) $$

where $u$ ranges from $0$ to $\infty$.

  1. But shouldn't $(3)$ correspond to $(1)$ since the interpretaions, as mentioned (by Wikipedia, at least) are the same? why are the equations different?
  2. Also how can the probability of finding a particle in the velocity neighborhood about $v=0$ be the highest but probability of finding a particle in the speed neighborhood of $u=0$ be $0$ ? i.e , physically, why does $(2)$ peak at $0$ when $(1)$ is $0$ at $0$?
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $(1)$ includes all the velocities with magnitude $v$ distributed over all directions, i.e. you need to take the spherical shell from $v$ to $v+dv$ into accounts. $(2)$ specifies every components. By the way, if the gases are confined in $1$-D space, there's no analogous distribution of velocities at all. Since any colliding particles are just exchanging their velocities due to elastic head-on collision. $\endgroup$ – Ng Chung Tak Mar 5 '17 at 11:11
4
$\begingroup$

You have to go back to see where your equation $(1)$ came from.

For one dimension the probability of particles having a velocity between $\vec v_{\rm x}$ and $\vec v_{\rm x}+ d\vec v_{\rm x}$ is given by

$$f(\vec v_{\rm x})\;d\vec v_{\rm x} =\sqrt{\frac{m}{ 2\pi kT}}\exp \left[\frac{-mv_{\rm x}^2}{2kT}\right]\,d\vec v_{\rm x}$$

The speed distribution is given by $$f(v_{\rm x})\;dv_{\rm x} =2\,\sqrt{\frac{m}{ 2\pi kT}}\exp \left[\frac{-mv_{\rm x}^2}{2kT}\right]\,dv_{\rm x}=\sqrt{\frac{2m}{ \pi kT}}\exp \left[\frac{-mv_{\rm x}^2}{2kT}\right]\,dv_{\rm x}$$

the factor $2$ being there because the speed (magnitude) of $\vec v_{\rm x}$ is the same as that of $-\vec v_{\rm x}$.
This is in agreement with your equation $(3)$.

Equation $(1)$ came from the idea that in three dimensions there is no preferred direction so

$f(\vec v_{\rm x},\vec v_{\rm xy},\vec v_{\rm z})\,d\vec v_{\rm x}d\vec v_{\rm y}d\vec v_{\rm z} = f(\vec v_{\rm x})d\vec v_{\rm x}\,f(\vec v_{\rm y})d\vec v_{\rm y}\,f(\vec v_{\rm z})d\vec v_{\rm z}$

You now have to count all the speeds which are the same ie the magnitude of the velocity $v$ is the same where $v^2 = v^2_{\rm x}+v^2_{\rm y}+v^2_{\rm z}$.

In this three dimensional case the volume of a shell of radius $v$ and thickness $dv$ is $d\vec v_{\rm x}d\vec v_{\rm y}d\vec v_{\rm z}= 4 \pi v^2 dv$ is being considered which results in your equation $(1)$.

$$f(v) \,dv = \sqrt{\left(\frac{m}{2 \pi kT}\right)^3}\, 4\pi v^2 \exp \left[\frac{-mv^2}{2kT}\right] \,dv$$

The equivalent distribution for two dimensions with an area of a ring of radius $v$ and thickness $dv$ is $d\vec v_{\rm x}d\vec v_{\rm y}= 2 \pi v\, dv$ and $v^2 = v^2_{\rm x}+v^2_{\rm y}$ is

$$f(v) \,dv = \left(\frac{m}{2 \pi kT}\right)\, 2\pi v\, \exp \left[\frac{-mv^2}{2kT}\right] \,dv$$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.