3
$\begingroup$

In Quantum Electrodynamics by Landau and Lifshiz there is the following:

The correspondence between the spinor $\zeta^{\alpha \dot{\beta}}$ and the 4-vector is a particular case of a general rule: any symmetrical spinor of rank $(k,k)$ is equivalent to a symmetrical 4-tensor of rank $k$ which is irreducible (i.e. which gives zero upon contraction with respect to any pair of indices).

L&L also writes out this for a 4-vector $$ \zeta^{1\dot{1}}=\zeta_{2\dot{2}}=a^3+a^0 ,\quad \zeta^{2\dot{2}}=\zeta_{1\dot{1}}=a^0-a^3, $$ $$ \zeta^{1\dot{2}}=-\zeta_{2\dot{1}}=a^1-ia^2 ,\quad \zeta^{2\dot{1}}=-\zeta_{1\dot{2}}=a^1+ia^2, $$

Surely there must be an established method to do this in general just like it says above. I would like to know this method, so if someone would be kind enough to show me or refer me to a reference I would be grateful, (e.g. suppose I would like to know the components for $\zeta^{\alpha\beta\dot{\gamma}\dot{\delta}}$ in terms of the symmetric traceless rank-2, 4-tensor).

Thanks,

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ You might want to look into Penrose and Rindler's Spinors and Space-Time which looks into this in great detail (it's what the two volumes are entirely about!). $\endgroup$ Jul 9, 2012 at 4:51

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

The method is to contract every index with the $\sigma$ four vector:

$$ \sigma^\mu_{\alpha\dot{\beta}}$$

Where $\sigma^0$ is the identity, and $\sigma^i$ for i=1,2,3 is the Pauli spin matrix.

If you have a symmetric tensor with all lower indices, you contract each $\mu$ index with a sigma, and you get the dotted-undotted form.

$$ M_{\mu\nu} \sigma^\mu_{\alpha\dot{\beta}}\sigma^\nu_{\alpha'\dot{\beta}'} = M_{\alpha\alpha'\dot{\beta}\dot{\beta}'} $$

If M is symmetric on $\mu$ and $\nu$, this is symmetric under permutations of the pairs of corresponding dotted and undotted indices simultaneously. It is not symmetric under separate permutations of the dotted and undotted indices.

$$ M_{\alpha\alpha'\dot{\beta}\dot{\beta}'} = M_{\alpha'\alpha\dot{\beta}'\dot{\beta}}$$

But this is because I haven't implemented tracelessness. The inner product of two vectors in spinor form is given by using $\epsilon$ tensors:

$$ V_{\alpha\dot{\alpha}} V_{\beta\dot{\beta}} \epsilon^{\alpha\beta}\epsilon^{\dot{\alpha}\dot{\beta}}$$

If you make the contraction of M with g zero, in spinor form, this tells you that

$$ M_{\alpha\beta\dot{\alpha}\dot{\beta}} - M_{\beta\alpha\dot{\alpha}\dot{\beta}} = 0$$

Which together with the previous condition tells you that the M in spinor form is symmetric under separate permutations of the two indices. The higher rank proof is exactly the same.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks Ron. Should the $\beta$s in the second line be dotted? $\endgroup$
    – kηives
    Jul 9, 2012 at 19:03
  • $\begingroup$ @kηives: Yes, I'll fix it. I was suspended and couldn't do it. $\endgroup$
    – Ron Maimon
    Jul 10, 2012 at 19:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.