2
$\begingroup$

Is there any online derivation for the Alcubierre Drive? I have looked at several papers and none of them actually derive the equations. They simply point them out. Particularly, I would like a derivation of how he arrives at his metric,

$$ \mathrm{d}s^2 ~ = ~ -\left(\alpha^2 - \beta_i\beta^i\right)\mathrm{d}t^2 + 2\beta_i \, \mathrm{d}x^i \, \mathrm{d}t + \gamma_{ij} \, \mathrm{d}x^i \, \mathrm{d}x^j \,.$$

I am unsure how he arrived at this equation. I have studied some tensor calculus and analysis and know enough about the metric tensor and other variables to get semi close to deriving Einstein's field equations. However, I don't understand this. Did he use the 3+1 formalism to arrive at this equation? If this is the case, can anyone point me to where it is derived or could someone show me the derivation so I can practice.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This is just the standard ADM form of the metric... $\endgroup$ – Akoben Mar 3 '17 at 19:24
  • $\begingroup$ @Cosmoman See lanl.arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0009013v1. $\endgroup$ – udrv Mar 3 '17 at 19:30
  • $\begingroup$ Without specifying $\alpha$, $\beta^i$ and $\gamma_{ij}$ this equation is meaningless. Any metric can be cast into this form! $\endgroup$ – Prof. Legolasov Mar 6 '17 at 14:59
3
$\begingroup$

The metric written,

$$ds^2 = -(\alpha^2 - \beta_i\beta^i)dt^2 + 2\beta_i dx^i dt + \gamma_{ij}dx^i dx^j$$

is the highly general expression for the metric of a manifold which can be foliated by space-like hypersurfaces. That is to say, one can think of the spacetime as a timeline of space-like manifolds, with $\alpha$ specifying the proper time between each.


The Alcubierre metric is the case for which $\alpha= 1$, $\beta^x = -v_s(t)f(r(t))$ and $\gamma_{ij} = \delta_{ij}$ is the Euclidean metric, with,

$$r(t)^2 = (x-x_s(t))^2 + y^2+z^2, \quad f(r) = \frac{\tanh \sigma(r+R)-\tanh\sigma(r-R)}{2\tanh\sigma R}$$

which yields the metric,

$$ds^2=(v_s^2f(r)^2-1)dt^2-2v_sf(r)dxdt + dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2.$$

Alcubierre himself in the original paper does not show how this was derived; it seems to have been more of an educated guess. However the motivation is clear; in the $3+1$ formalism (chosen partially to guarantee that closed timelike curves were not possible) he sought a way to modify the metric in a way to allow a body to be 'pushed' along the trajectory $x_s(t)$.


Notice the metric can be written as,

$$ds^2 = -dt^2 + (dx-v_s f(r)dt)^2 + dy^2 + dz^2.$$

In the limit the parameter $\sigma \to \infty$,

$$f(r) = \Theta(r+R)-\Theta(r-R)$$

where $\Theta$ is the Heaviside step function. Thus, we see that for $r\in[-R,R]$, there is some motion with velocity $v_s$ and outside of this region $f=0$, and we enter purely flat space.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Essentially, Alcubierre defined the metric through the ADM formalism of general relativity, which states that spacetime is foliated into space-like hypersurfaces of constant coordinate time t. Through this, he created his metric such that space was warped in the desired way. I don't have enough reputation to comment and wasn't sure how to format the equations on here properly, but http://zelmanov.ptep-online.com/papers/zj-2009-12.pdf explains how it was derived.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.