8
$\begingroup$

I saw this picture of a "rainbow from above"

enter image description here

Based on what I understand about rainbows, some googling and my experience chasing them, if I saw one and try to fly above it, the phenomenon will disappear as I move forward and up.

Some argue with that logic citing rainbows on waterfalls seen from above, but in that case I believe the mix "water/light/angles" is not the same.

So now I have some doubts (small ones, but valid at the end), can I fly over a rainbow? (rain rainbow, from the clouds, on an airliner)

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I strongly suspect that the artwork is the work of a photoshop-er. $\endgroup$ – Yashas Feb 27 '17 at 16:04
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The colors have too much angular size for this to be a real rainbow. Rainbows are strongly dependent on the relative angles of the water spray, light source and observer. And the angular size of the rainbow is fixed. $\endgroup$ – Bill N Feb 27 '17 at 16:54
10
$\begingroup$

To see a rainbow you need to be looking directly away from the Sun. If there is a region of the atmosphere containing water droplets somewhere on a circle at 42 degrees around the shadow of your head, and there is direct sunlight on that region, then it is possible to see a partial rainbow coming from it. If the whole circle at 42 degrees is covered by water droplets, it is possible to see a full circle rainbow.

From the ground you will only see a semi-circle at best, when the sun is low in the sky and you are close to the rain storm. The rest of the circle is obscured by the horizon. You can see a full circle rainbow if you are above ground level and the water droplets cover a large enough area.

There is no reason why you cannot see a partial rainbow directly below you if there is a region of airborne water droplets there and if the Sun is at an angle of 42 degrees from the zenith. This is close to the situation of seeing a rainbow in the spray from a waterfall below you.

To see a full circle rainbow centred on the point directly below you the Sun would have to be directly overhead. As you point out, the clouds needed to produce rain are likely to obstruct the Sun from reaching the droplets.

So yes it is possible to see rainbows from above, but you cannot fly over them - they move with you, you can never cross over the arc. (If the Sun is moving overhead, the rainbow could move under you.) The rainbow will disappear if you move away from the region containing water droplets.

However, your photograph is not a rainbow. It can be explained by polarization and interference (instead of reflection and refraction for the rainbos). Light reflected from the surface of the water is partially polarized (fully polarized when reflected at the Brewster angle - $53^{\circ}$ for water). The pre-stressed nature of the airplane's plastic window makes it birefringent. Light travels at two different speeds through the window, depending on its polarization. This results in interference between the two polarizations of light emerging from the window, which can be detected with a polarizing filter on the camera or in front of the eye : different colours are in phase at different angles from the observer.

See : https://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/oct/29/fly-over-rainbow-break-laws-physics
http://atmospherical.blogspot.co.uk/2008/04/polarization-colours-in-airplane-window.html?m=1
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/polint.html

The spectrum in your photo is far too broad to be a rainbow. Compare with the following, also photographed from the air. The sharpness is due to larger drops at this altitude.

enter image description here http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2014/09/17/circular_rainbow_rare_optic_effect_seen_from_the_air.html

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The answer isn't exactly "no" though. It is possible to observe a rainbow from above (in which case of course it comes out as a full circle), as a google image search will testify. It's just that, as you say, this photograph isn't of a rainbow. $\endgroup$ – Nathaniel Feb 26 '17 at 23:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It should be added that the light reflecting off the water is polarized to begin with (see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brewster's_angle), allowing the birefringence of the window to produce coloured effects. The light from the clouds is not polarized, so the colour effects do not extend to them... $\endgroup$ – DJohnM Feb 27 '17 at 2:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ the picture explanation is useful, but regarding the first paragraph and in general; if the sun is above the observer (in the airliner) the water droplets zone view would be obstructed due the clouds (the source of the rain), and if the observer can see the droplets zone, then the clouds would be above obstructing the sun above, or the rain needs a different angle than usual, so still not sure about the particular case described in the question (the part in bold) $\endgroup$ – Felipe Pereira Feb 27 '17 at 13:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.