3
$\begingroup$

Could someone explain to me how Bell's theorem solves the EPR paradox and 'spooky action at a distance'?

From what I understand, when measuring a state, say spin up in the x direction, the wave function collapses and the other particle must be spin down in the x direction instantaneously no matter how far it is from its entangled partner.

I can't seem to put all the pieces together with local realism and local hidden variables.

| cite | improve this question | | | | |
$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Bells inequality is derived by assuming 'local reality'. This inequality has been shown to be violated by experiment and by theory (quantum mechanics). So the conclusion is: nature doesnt always posess local reality. Assuming local reality made EPR a paradox, so without this it is resolved.

| cite | improve this answer | | | | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. These three lines explain it better than any other explanation I have seen yet wherein they delve in the details without giving a clear overview. Perhaps I would add that for the first time an experiment was devised that would yield different results between local reality and spooky action at a distance, for which there is no obvious way to differentiate. $\endgroup$ – DPM Apr 12 at 0:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.