Here's a description of how I calculated COR:
- Formula $COR=√(h/H)$
- I have 7 intervals where I measured $h$ and $H$
- I did 5 trials for measuring $h$ and $H$ for each interval (in total 35 measurements for each of them)
- The absolute uncertainty is the same for both $h$ and $H$ and is 0.002 m
My question is:
- How do I propagate the uncertainty for the COR?
-
$\begingroup$ What do you already know about your question? $\endgroup$– Brian MothsFeb 17, 2017 at 22:48
-
$\begingroup$ @NowIGetToLearnWhatAHeadIs I have all the values of h and H as well as their absolute uncertainty (0.002 as stated above) and also the values of COR. one way I thought of to calculate the COR uncertainty is: 0.5*((SD/Mean of h)+(SD/Mean of H)) but I am not sure if it is correct this way $\endgroup$– BayanFeb 17, 2017 at 22:51
2 Answers
You have values for 7 different heights. For each height you can compute the error using standard methods. Combining the 7 values you want to take the weighted mean of the 7 CORs. Do you know how to compute the error for a weighted mean?
-
-
$\begingroup$ See slide 3 of colorado.edu/physics/phys2150/phys2150_sp14/phys2150_lec4.pdf $\endgroup$– FlorisFeb 17, 2017 at 23:42
-
$\begingroup$ Perhaps you should explain how to calculate error for the weighted mean in your answer, instead of providing a link. $\endgroup$ Feb 18, 2017 at 17:27
-
$\begingroup$ @sammygerbil that would be better but I am traveling and it's hard to do this on my phone. Thought I would help OP get started. "Teach a man to fish..." $\endgroup$– FlorisFeb 18, 2017 at 17:30
-
When doing a statistical analysis you can ignore the absolute uncertainty in the measurements, particularly when it is the same for each.
I would plot a graph of $h$ vs $H$, either using all 35 data points or using the 7 average values of $h$ if the values of $H$ were all the same. This will show you if the COR is constant over the range of your experiment. If it is not changing, you can fit a trend line of the form $y=bx$; the slope of this line is $b=e^2$ where $e$ is COR. You can use the squared deviations of data points from this line to calculate the Standard Error in the slope. If the slope is changing you can fit a quadratic $y=bx+cx^2$ then again use the value of $b$, which is the slope at small values of $x$.
You can do all this in a spreadsheet. Excel has built-in statistical tools which can help you. See http://www.chem.mtu.edu/~fmorriso/cm3215/UncertaintySlopeInterceptOfLeastSquaresFit.pdf. Or you could use data analysis software such as Origin or CurveFit to get the Standard Error.
When you have the Standard Error $S_b$ in slope $b$ then the COR is given by
$e^2=b\pm S_b=b(1\pm\frac{S_b}{b})$
$e=\sqrt{b}(1\pm \frac{S_b}{b})^{\frac12}\approx\sqrt{b}\pm\frac{S_b}{2\sqrt{b}}$.
If the above is too much effort, calculate the COR for each of the 35 readings, then use the data analysis tools in a spreadsheet to calculate the mean $m$ and standard deviation $\sigma$. Even basic models have AVERAGE and STDEV. The Standard Error in the mean is $S_m=\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{N}}$. Your result is $m\pm S_m$.