8
$\begingroup$

I have not seen any complete derivation for the metric in a limited newtonian case:

$$\begin{align} ds^{2} = -(1+2\Phi)dt^{2} +(1-2\Phi)\left(dr^{2} + r^{2}(d\theta^{2} + \sin^{2} \theta\ d\phi^{2})\right). \end{align}$$

I believe that we should begin from cartesian form of the metric and then apply the transformation for spherical coordinates:

$$\begin{align} ds^{2} = -(1+2\Phi)dt^{2} +(1-2\Phi)\delta_{ij}dx^{i}dx^{j} \end{align}$$

In the newtonian limit:

  1. Particles are moving slowly
  2. The gravity field is weak
  3. The field is static

With these conditions, we can perturb the metric linearly:

$$\begin{align} g_{\mu \nu} &= \eta_{\mu \nu} + h_{\mu \nu} \\ g^{\mu \nu} &= \eta^{\mu \nu} - h^{\mu \nu} \end{align}$$ where $\eta_{\nu \mu}$ is some canonical metric (Minkowski then in this case) and $|h_{\mu \nu}| \ll 1$ is a small perturbation.

If we then follow the time component our the geodesic equation:

$$\begin{align} \frac{d^{2}x^{u}}{d\tau^{2}} + \Gamma^{\mu}_{\nu \lambda}\frac{dx^{\nu}}{d\tau}\frac{dx^{\lambda}}{d\tau} = 0 \end{align}$$

and then solve for time and spatial components (while taking the time derivative of a static field):

$$\begin{align} \frac{d^{2}x^{\mu}}{d\tau^{2}} + \Gamma^{\mu}_{00} \left( \frac{dt}{d\tau} \right)^{2} &= 0 \\ \frac{d^{2}x^{\mu}}{d\tau^{2}} &= - \frac{1}{2} \eta^{\mu \lambda}\partial_{\lambda}h_{00} \left( \frac{dt}{d\tau} \right)^{2} \end{align}$$

we see that when $\mu=0$:

$$\begin{align} \frac{dt}{d\tau} = constant \end{align}$$

and when we see that when $\mu=i$:

$$\begin{align} \frac{d^{2}x^{i}}{dt^{2}} &= - \frac{1}{2} \partial_{i} h_{00} \end{align}$$

in which we have $h_{00} = -2 \Phi$, reminiscent of that of the acceleration $\vec{a} = -\nabla \Phi $ where $\Phi$ is the newtonian potential.

Thus $$\begin{align} g_{00} &= - (1+2\Phi). \end{align}$$

Now my problem is trying to solve for the spatial components $g_{ij}$ in a similar fashion.

When trying to work it out, my work starts to look convoluted and messy and I just get lost in translation:

$$\begin{align} \Gamma^{\mu}_{ij}&= \frac{1}{2} g^{\mu \nu} ( \partial_{i}g_{\nu j} + \partial_{j}g_{i \nu} - \partial_{\nu}g_{i j} ). \\ \end{align}$$

Taking $\mu=0$, the whole connection goes to zero. But for a spatial components while implementing the perturbed metric, I get stuck.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

I might have found the solution.

In the spatial configuration: $$ \begin{align} \frac{d^{2}x^{\mu}}{d \tau^{2}} + \Gamma^{\mu}_{ij}\frac{dx^{i}}{d\tau}\frac{dx^{j}}{d\tau} = 0 \end{align} $$ The affine connection expanded out is of the form: $$ \begin{align} \Gamma^{\mu}_{ij} = \frac{1}{2}g^{\mu \nu}( \partial_{i}g_{\nu j} + \partial_{j}g_{i \nu} - \partial_{\nu}g_{i j} ) \end{align} $$

If $\mu=0$ then the time derivatives of the static field will vanish and metrics non diagonal points are zero.

Taking the spatial component of the connections: $$ \begin{align} \Gamma^{k}_{ij} = \frac{1}{2}g^{k l}( \partial_{i}g_{l j} + \partial_{j}g_{i l} - \partial_{l}g_{i j} ) \end{align} $$ Equating the lower indices and taking the newtonian limit yields: $$ \begin{align} \Gamma^{k}_{ii} &= \frac{1}{2}\eta^{k l}( \partial_{i}h_{l i} + \partial_{i}h_{i l} - \partial_{l}h_{i i} ) \\ &= - \frac{1}{2}\eta^{k l} \partial_{l}h_{i i} \end{align} $$ by the symmetry of the metric.

With our geodesic in this form, and taking the newtonian limit: $$ \begin{align} \frac{d^{2}x^{k}}{d \tau^{2}} + \Gamma^{k}_{ij}\frac{dx^{i}}{d\tau}\frac{dx^{j}}{d\tau} &= 0 \\ \frac{d^{2}x^{k}}{d t^{2}} &= - \Gamma^{k}_{ii}\left( \frac{dx^{i}}{dt}\right)^{2} \\ \frac{d^{2}x^{k}}{d t^{2}} &= \frac{1}{2}\eta^{k l} \partial_{l}h_{i i} \left( \frac{dx^{i}}{dt}\right)^{2} \\ \frac{d^{2}x^{k}}{d t^{2}} &= \frac{1}{2} \partial_{k}h_{i i} \left( \frac{dx^{i}}{dt}\right)^{2} \end{align} $$

Comparing to the equation for a gravitational potential $\vec{a} = - \nabla \Phi$, I just deduce that $h_{ii} = -2 \Phi$, just like for the time component iff $i=j$.

Thus,

$$ \begin{align} g_{ij} &= (1 -2 \Phi ) \delta_{ij} \end{align} $$

Completing the metric and hopefully by applying spherical coordinate transformation, produces the approximation metric for Earth.

Edit:

Their is no need for a coordinate transformation. You can see that expanding out the line element we can tac on the metric for a two sphere and argue that the deviation of the radius is just $dr^{2} = dx^{2} + dy^{2} + dz^{2}$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.